1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

The Arab-Islamic gang "lobby" that overtook Wikipedia and controls it 100%

Reader comment on item: Confirmed: Barack Obama Practiced Islam
in response to reader comment: Wikipedia rejects this article

Submitted by Laura (Guatemala), Mar 30, 2011 at 14:31

The Arab-Islamic gang "lobby" that overtook Wikipedia and controls it 100%

OPENNESS VS THE ISLAMIC LOBBY'S "TERRITORY"

Wikipedia prides itself for being open where anyone can edit its content. But is that really so? Can anyone really write a good article? Can anyone edit content freely? Who decides what stays on and what not? Wikipedia has a system of "notice board" which is supposedly "talking it out" on a forum openly to make "sure" it's unbiased. The problem is that the Arab-Islamic lobby, working in close coordination, manipulates Wikipedia and its entire system. The lobby's work has such a grip that some of the administrators are on their side. Thus, be sure that in 99% of disputes between any one of the Islamic lobbyists and a person that dares challange anti-Israel slander (and the like), the outcome is usually certain, all the in between talk is just a game, to make it look "real."

The clear goal of the Arab-Islamic lobby is: Make Israel, Jews and even Judaism look bad (which explains Arab-Islamic members of the lobby supporting material "contributed" by users belonging to "white supremacist," groups) Arabs, Muslims should be beautified.

For its clear set out goal, it will do anything to achieve it. They have learned well the system and managed to kick out anyone that disagrees with them via devious tricks.

MAJOR PLAYERS & ITS AIDE/S

If Wikipedia is to be trusted at all in anything that happens in the Middle East (or the like), it should first begin reverting anything that has ever happened where the "lobby" was involved, these two are major players (the list of members of the 'lobby' is huge, but these two are certainly "captains") in the 'Islamic militant lobby': 1) (Muslim) "Malik Shabazz" (obsessed with contributing to the "apartheid" slur on Israel, tied to user's account "Noleander" and covering for and eliminating material exposing Nation of Islam/NBPP's Samir Shabbaz who called to kill "white babies") and 2) (Arab) "Nableezy" (bent on rewriting history of "Palestine" and de-legitimizing any source that he doesn't like as "unreliable") Their methods of terrorizing any user that is "not in line" with their one sided thinking [which is empower and beautify all that is Arab-Islamic and demean especially Israel and often all Jews/Judaism] Option # 1: "keep sending senseless warnings" to harass the user. Option #2 "blame" him/her of being SP (sock puppet), where the only "proof" is that he/she agrees with a certain opinion of someone else's. These lobbyists, who always manage to get around Wikipedia's own rules, some of the so-called mediators like "sandstein" and "sean.holyand" were/are also siding with the gang, which is why Wikipedia as it is now, is totally manipulated.

SP - TRICK

Relying on Wikipedia's "rule" that if there's (just a) possibility that one is a SP of another, the action is favored to block both users. They have managed to ban many users - not connected to each other, for years.

Incidentally, one rarely goes after the pro-Arab pro-Islamic militant users, nor accuse them of being SP as they all seem to "automatically" agree [almost] on anything. Though some of them use multiple names of course, and are very organized, actions are well coordinated [take for example the Article for deletion for "Nazism in Arab Palestine" and see the intense fast organized 'tag-team' actions to remove the page, one after another all in such a narrow time period] like a gang. The gang that controls wikipedia especially since 2006.

Here comes again the evidence how the system is already rotten to the core. Whenever (rarely) a user complaints on one of the Arab-Islamic gang members as a SP, he/she is shoved away with statements like 'it is made in bad faith' thus giving the "administrator" the power to close the report immediately and they are never investigated. And the destructive organization works on.

A fairly new method how to follow the Islamic lobby's "insisting" of SP charges is to "accuse" the user of using a proxy without any evidence. Since no 'check user' (a system, where administrators supposedly check IP usage, etc.) of any identical IP address can ever be found (between the "accused" of being SP), the trick gets easier, since the 'administrator" can't prove the user actually uses a proxy, but suspect the user, nevertheless (still, only on the basis of expressing a point-of-view which the Islamic lobby member pushes as "proof" of linking users), now the road to ban is all cleared, "good" to go. Though unfounded, it is masked under "accused of using a proxy to hide itself."

The plan works again and again, whenever they (usually) succeed in banning a person that has a different point of view than the "lobby," he/she can't even protest or explain and reveal what is really going on. A "banned" member is not able to write/edit anything any more, not even contest the "banning" page upon him/her. Smooth job, a kind of "cleansing" by the radical Arab-Islamic "wolf pack."

SUMMARY OF ISLAMIC LOBBY'S TOTALITARIANISM

Basically the well organized gang/lobby works to convert Wikipedia into a totalitarian zone via:

  • A. - Dominating [especially] all Middle East related content by coordinated actions (they are connected by alerts, mostly off wikipdia) the unexplained swift rapid actions in a coordinated manner are evident.

  • B. - Gagging any protesting voice.

  • c. "Deciding" what's a reliable source according to the material suitable (or not) in line with the Islamic lobby.

  • D. - (Unfairly cause to) Blocking all who are not in line by abusing Wikipedia's own rules. (or at least:)

  • E. - Bullying, taking severe harassing measures (constant "warnings" and nagging administrators to take "action" against a targeted user, using any excuse they can think of).

CLEAN-UP WIKIPEDIA?

The first 5 steps, in cleaning up Wikipedia, aught to be:

1) Any article or "SP" argument that anyone of the gang members have been linked to, have to be reviewed.

2) Any member that has been banned on the basis of a gang members' argument for agreeing with a certain point of view, has to be reinstated/unblocked.

3) All of the 'gang members' have to be investigated for "multiple accounts," in order to see who "else" are linked to this Goliath lobby monster.

4) All the gang members have to be banned for acting in a control lobby of a supposedly open encyclopedia.

5) Investigate the "moderators" that have been involved in agreeing systematically with the gang.

The span is at least between 2006 and current date.

Some of the notorious Islamic-Lobby "activists"

Malik_Shabazz
Nableezy
Jojhutton
RolandR
Zero0000
Tiamut
Huldra
Andrensath

Some of (biased) administrators:

sean hoyland
Sandstein
Shink
NativeForeigner

Nazi users - often backed by Arab-Islamic lobbyists:

Noleander Obsessed with anti-Jewish posting, (rewritiung history and fantasy libels) material taken out from Neo Nazi websites and Nation of Islam which he tries to "legitimize."
(The following Neo Nazi user changed his account name Stonemason89, Who knows under what name he hides under now.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The Arab-Islamic gang "lobby" that overtook Wikipedia and controls it 100% by Laura

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)