2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

'Turk' means "uncouth barbarian" in Osmanlica , oguztolga .

Reader comment on item: Turkey in Cyprus vs. Israel in Gaza
in response to reader comment: there was no Byzantian Empire just a manupulated lie

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Aug 5, 2010 at 16:28

oguztolga teaches :

> I know it is not easy to owercome inferiorty complex of being a manufactured country/nation and a state.<

Take Turkey for instance with so inhibited and crippled history that anything written before 1928 is no longer understandable to 99,8% Turks. Thus with a single blow Turks lost any contact with 99% of their historical past. The very language they speak nowadays is an artificial language created by Ataturk to make the last connection with the past disappear. This notwithstanding this artificial newspeak was declared to be the oldest model language of mankind. ;)

And the reason for this parody of amnesia ordained from above by a fearful bloody dictator and mass murderer is very understandable. In Osmanlica , the language of the educated classess of the Ottoman empire "Turk" was a term of abuse and insult . It meant roughly " uncouth barbarian" , "vulgar blockhead". Quite apt, wasn't it , oguztolga, when one considers your plagirisms here ?

Nowadas the Turks sing their extatic "Ne mutlu turkum diyene" everyday several times at school and outside it without ever suspecting what a grim travesty it is from a historical perspective. But in Turkey historical memory worth the name doesn't exist as we have said. And frankly , what history can a country have which criminalizes free exchange of opinions on history ? I'd get 3-4 years in jail for quoting in public a 15the century poem by Ahmet Çelebi which exposes the Turks as stupid barbarians or quoting Osmanlica as the best proof what "Turk" stands for in a wider historical and social perception.

>I understand your inferiorty to be screwed under Turkish mandatory for 450years.<

The Turkish barbarity oppressed many other superior nations. But how strange that after 500 years of Turkish savagery the higher spirit and love of liberty and historical memory among the Bulgarians, the Serbs, the Greeks have prevailed over primitive Moslem tyranny.

>I really know your anger and hate for the kicked by Turks in every 50 years.

You should rather tell us what a Moslem Turk like you feel when he looks at the map around 1500 and now ? It's you that lost everything and eventually were only saved in the Anatolian cesspool by the communist- Kemalist conspiracy in 1920-1922.

" Mithology has been manufactured as your culture.
Even your mythology is manufactured by others to keep Greeks away from sea trade in the old times.
Than this mythology of 150years became your history(!)hahahahaah
and culture(hahahahaah)

Speaking of culture and mythology , here is what 18th century French scholar M. Guer wrote in his "Manners and customs of the Turks, their civil , political and military government" , Paris 1784 , [ v. 1. p. 8] on you Turks :

"To obliterate the hateful connotations that had stained the very name "Turk" Osman Gazi decreed that this name would be given only to the backward uncouth peasants and that his other subjects would be called "Ottomans". As a result even today the word "Turk" doesn't mean anything else except a "stupid vulgar peasant" and anything disgusting, mean and wicked that one can only imagine. This name "Turk" seems to be so insulting and hateful to all the subjects of the empire that when one asks anyone of them if he is a Turk , he responds : "No, I am not. I am a Moslem", i.e. "a true believer". "

Well, despite all the twistings and turnings of the Ataturkish brainwashing and newspeak inventions known as his "language reforms" the original meaning of the term "Turk" has never been lost and now its ancient use should be restored to its full right .

> As everything greek your mythology is also Klephtocratic lie.
MONARCHY
of Bavarian and Danish origin. ...

etc.

Just for your information , out of 35 sultans none had a Turkish mother. Mehmet II was half-Serbian , Beyazid Ildirim half-Bulgarian , Suleyman Kanuni was in half a Polish Jew , Selim I half-Russian , Abdul hamid II was an Armenian etc. etc. And even your Ataturk with blue eyes and blonde hair looked more like a Russian than a descendant of the Mongolian Seljuks from Central Asia.The state apparatus was ruled by renegade Armenains, Greeks, Serbians. The army stood and fell with the robbery of Christian boys aand their forced Sialmization as the Moslem Turks didn't produce but rabble useless for a regular warware and real battles. So speaking figuratively don't spit against the wind because you'll be overflooded with your own saliva, Turk.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to 'Turk' means "uncouth barbarian" in Osmanlica , oguztolga . by Ianus

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)