69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Ban Islam?
in response to reader comment: I agree.

Submitted by AS (India), Mar 6, 2010 at 05:17

"...I definitely believe in the separation of church and state, but without the suppression of religion (for example, through banning outward expressions of religious belief). While I can understand some of the arguments for having an Islamic state, and of course Islam does provide for that because it began at a time when -all- governments were religious to one degree or another, ..."

believe in separation of church and state in other countries so that islam can flourish! but somehow she 'understands' why 'islamic' state should exist!!!! the excuse further goes based on historical reasons. (and they should continue to exist!!)

off course islam does provide for this!!!

to all foolish, secular americans. beware ...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)