69 million page views

"Coverse fallacy of accident" Really?

Reader comment on item: Ban Islam?
in response to reader comment: Dhimmi's Converse Fallacy of Accident delusions will no longer be tolerated

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 22, 2008 at 07:33

So what did we learn from our dear Keith? Nothing as usual

You told us that islam is against terrorism. Right? And i told you that based on Q8:60 you must be wrong and I even was kind enough to tell you, and based on reading the Qur'an in Arabic a language that you cannot read, write or speak (remember al-bakistaniyya?), who are those regarded as Allah's enemies. Right? So what is your problem? Oh I see you realized that we infidles know more about Islam that you seem to know.

Oh and it seems that your Allah has no difficulty with al-mulhiduun and now you learned something new


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)