69 million page views

Susan, why I am not replying to that Pakistani's recent post

Reader comment on item: Ban Islam?
in response to reader comment: Romesh Chander got it?

Submitted by Romesh Chander (United States), Sep 14, 2007 at 16:14

Susan, that is why I am not replying to his recent post. They cannot stand logic. They want to tell others how to behave but don't want to listen to others; that is the self-righteous attitude of Islamists (not logical people).

They consider lashing woman as a Human Rights Event. I wonder do they know the meaning of a Human Being. In muslim countries, dogs and cats are treated better than women (and dogs are supposed to be unclean in Islam).

Funny part is that they want an islamic government wih Sharia, and then try to convince others that they can ignore Sharia at will. I don't think they can fool anybody. I hope they are not fooling Allah with this kind of logic. May be they can cite some kind of Hadith for that and their illogic?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)