69 million page views

Why didn't Denmark invoke Article 5

Reader comment on item: Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism
in response to reader comment: Islam is Peace

Submitted by Mike Klein (United States), Feb 14, 2006 at 22:40

I know it would have been too much to ask--but with embassies representing "foreign territory", surely Denmark would have been justified in invoking NATO's Article 5 (an attack on one state is an attack on all), thus putting the onus on NATO to stomp on any country where this happened.

Just a thought...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)