More fanatic login

Submitted by Rajeev (United States), Jan 14, 2011 at 03:26

Dear Dr Pipes: Reader Jamil Akhtar Khan presents one more example of circular fanatic logic. Khan says that Muhammad's existence is cited in Bible (so Muhammad must be a prophet). But then have I not heard from Muslims that bible is not the work of God because it has been corrupted by its follower. Thus, bible is not authentic unless it mentions Muhammad. Go figure.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".