69 million page views

Another scenario for the Romans

Reader comment on item: Churches in Saudi Arabia?
in response to reader comment: You gave me

Submitted by Samer Sukhun (United Arab Emirates), Apr 30, 2008 at 18:51

I will give you another scenario,

The muslims defeated their enemy in the battle of Badr against their enemey, they were 300 marching soldier muslims, while their enemey were counted 1000 better armed with 70 caveliers.

The muslims defeated their enemy in the Battle of Ahzabm they were 1000 and their enemy were 3000 much better armed than the muslims, - you can check internet

in the History of Tabukm the Muslims were 30,000 soldeirs and the Romans were 100,000 soldiers

as you can see, it is always 3:1 m so the romans for sure knows about the battles of Badr and Ahzab, and they have spies, they know the enemy who started marching to tabuk is 30,000 samll calculation they know yhey will be defeated they ran off before the muslims arrive.

By the way, the Romans army is always ready in palestine, remember the two battles with Persia in the jordan valley - the lowest land on earth. and then with Byzantine

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)