Our dear samer the victim of Arabian imperialism and Jospeh Smith

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 21, 2008 at 06:40

Our dear Samer who is not man enough to admit that he does not know what the Qur'an says in Arabic as in the case of adna v. al-adna wrote

>If you accept that prophets are corrupt - then you are corrupt too

Wow then I'm guilty as charged. You? you are a victim of Arabian imperialism and for this I pity you

But wait: what is really "corrupt"? You? you are here defending the religion and imerialism of the Arabs that brutalized your own ancestors. You are the one who is really "corrupt" and I pity you

>We do not accept that prophets are corrupt and they should not be,

And who is the "we"? Is this your mutiple personalities and screen names and you thought that I will not find you? and who cares if you accept or not? And what on earth is this "corrupt:" thing of yours?

>otherwise they are not prophets

But I told you that Allah spoke to me via an angel called gabriel and I have a book for you. So I must conculde that I'm a prophet and therefore I'm not corrupt. See? Logic is easy.

Oh and do you also accept that Joseph Smith (who claimed to be a prophet. Oh you do not know who is Joseph Smith. right?) and to paraphrase what you just wrote: "I samer al-tablighee do not accept that Joseph Smith the prophet was corrupt " Right?

>You are the ignorant - read what mormon is

The term most often refers to a member of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), which is commonly called the Mormon Church

You are the one who is ignorant. Mormonism is an American religion. and Joseph Smith the prophet of mormonism (surpirse) was no more than the likes of Muhammad. He claimed that an angel spoke to him and revealed a book to him and he was a liar and a polygamist and he also had his little Hijra to Utah from Vermont.

Sounds familiar our dear Samer? and if we are not to believe him then why should we believe Muhammad?After all remember that Muhammad was the so called "seal of prophets" which means that he was no prophet and he was not a rasul. So you see your little theory is bogus

>So you don't have in your book angel Gabriel

Oh I do and he spoke to me just like he spoke to Muhammad the caravan raider and Arabian warlord and if you believe that Gabrile spoke to Muhammad then why should you not believe that he spoke to me too?.

>The rest is bla bla bla - I will not answer - because you are ignorant - you like just bla bla bla

No it is blah...blah...

>Keep at it - and blind

No it is you that is blind and a victim of Arabian imperialism

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".