1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

For Azmat Zuberi (Rabina Yu3azim Alihu) nahw 101 part deux

Reader comment on item: Trouble in Londonistan
in response to reader comment: "Islam" Denotes "Peace" - Arabic 101

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 13, 2006 at 18:25

You consult " Ar-Raghib (sic) Lane"(and it is al-Raghib ans not ar raghib as you claim (did you ever hear of the lam shamsiya and lam qamariya rule? Oh I forgot that you pretend to know Arabic) ? So what is that? a Pakistani ma3jam? Oh I forgot that you flunk in grammar and basic Arabic. Now wait a minute: did you ever hear of Sibawayhe?

I consult Ibn Manzur's Lisan al-3Arab so do you know who is Ibn Manzur and what is Lisan al-3Arab?I very much doubt. I also consult Hans Wehr dictionary of the Arabic language. You? you guess and you guess wrong and then you consult : ar Raghib (sic) Lane) whatever that is.

You are asking me if I consulted a Mullah, you are kidding me. Mullahs are ignorant.

You did ask me if I consulted a Mashiukh? If you mean by this did I consult a sheikh or he who pretends to be a sheikh? No I did not. I use a new invention foreign to Muslims called: books.

Now in number one you wrote: "ONE: by root word i clearly meant trilateral root"

After being exposed for your lack of knowledge of the Arabic language and the root system you are trying to find a way out. Let me repeat again: there is no such a thing as: _root word period_. Your ignorance of the root system of the Arabic language shines loud and clear.

Then you have the audacity to repeat your bogus claim that sa, la, ma and seen lam meem are one and the same. I call this Chutzpah! and you go and check with your ignorant Mullah or with your Sheikh/mashuikh if you wish what this word means.

So much for pakistanis pretending to know Arabic.

More in part trois

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to For Azmat Zuberi (Rabina Yu3azim Alihu) nahw 101 part deux by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)