4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

confused

Reader comment on item: Counting Islamists
in response to reader comment: The funny "no compulsion in religion" and our dear keith

Submitted by Keith Williams (United States), Dec 25, 2008 at 16:23

Hi dhimmi,

Merry Christmas again.

It seems that you are confusing me or maybe you drank too much egg nog.

you wrote:
>>

>Later the Al-sayf ayat

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic. It is ayat al-syaf and do me a favor stick to urdu

>reveals that this true religion will be the only one accepted by God and all other religions will come back into the one true original Islam (submission to the will of God).

Really? so where would I find in ayat al-sayf or even the Qur'an a book that you cannot read in Arabic: ina kul al-deyuuna sayarja3oo ila deen al-islam al-deen al-wahid wa al-deen al-haqiq

<<

Which one is it mr. dhimmi??? al-sayf or al-syaf? You keep flipping from one to the other. You corrected me that it should be al-syaf but you continue to use al-sayf. As a matter of fact you used al-sayf in all of your comment to me. You make yourself look very delusional when you are trying so hard to be biased against Islam and Muslims.

Lastly, you are still being delusional by calling me a Pakistani. You continue to do this even after I gave you a chance to prove yourself.>> "mr ignorant and do me a favor stick to urdu"<< I must remind you mr. dhimmi of my challenge to you to prove if you are delusional or not.

Dhimmi's Converse Fallacy of Accident delusions will no longer be tolerated

In which you reply with such a weak and fallacious trying to change the subect fallacy.

"Coverse fallacy of accident" Really?

Shame. I had expected better from you. You disappoint me. If you are going to ignore my commets then you can at least stop calling me a Pakistani and stop calling me a liar but you persist which really tells me that you are so deep inside your fantasy that you can no longer tell the difference. You have even fooled yourself.

Dhimmi no more, are you scared to face the fact that you may be indeed, delusional?

peace
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to confused by Keith Williams

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)