69 million page views

A comprehensive reply

Reader comment on item: Hijabs on Western Public Women
in response to reader comment: GLARING and MASSIVE mistakes in the Qur'an again

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Nov 19, 2011 at 21:14

I still await your name ... and you provide me with a link to verify your university study. I would be happy to reciprocate.

"There are indeed mistakes in grammar in the Qur'an"

I refer you to the posts above where I have comprehensively shown you are not even aware of absolute basics when it come to Arabic. Then how are you able to tell if Quran has grammatical mistakes?

Also - answer me this: All book of Arabic Grammar were written after the advent of Quran. Considering that language is subject to change - so how can former books of grammar be used to judge something that is precedes them?

It is ridiculous to judge Quran by the grammar of MSA. In a previous you yourself have said something similar...

Also Quran was a major source for Classical Grammar.

Second:

(a) - You still haven't managed to answer that who supports you in these bizarre claims from known Western Scholars of Islam?

Third:

Also not to forget previously you have ridiculed the works of Arabic Grammarians. So gain I will re-iterate for you. By which grammar are you judging the Holy Quran by? Surely not the one simply in your mind.

Rest of your post remains as nonsensical as ever. ...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A comprehensive reply by Amin Riaz

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)