1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

More Quraqnic disasters and this time ooops interpolation!

Reader comment on item: Hijabs on Western Public Women
in response to reader comment: Another lie - proven

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 23, 2011 at 14:42

Oh yes i believe that Mark knows Arabic and let me guess you did not pick it up and let me guess you had no clue what is al-seera al-nabawiyya means right? this is a far better transliterated Arabic by Mark than your bogus Pakistani Arabic nafiah (sic) lelnafs (sic) and fadih (sic) kabeer (sic) and calling in nafi (sic) and not realizing that without al al-ta3reef and al-tashkeel calling ibn naghl (sic) as son of bastad is bogus Paksitani Arabic

Oh and here is the Quranic disaster of the day: and for the readers: check Q53:32 or surat al-nijm and if you notice that out of no where this bizarre and very long aya is there that has no link with the prvious ayat or the following ayat so how do Muslims the masters of our dear Amin the wannabe arab explain this little fadiha? Well they tell us that this was revealed to Muhammad in Medina! But wait this whole sura is supposed to have been revealed in Mecca! How do you explain this disaster our dear Amin who lives among kuffar and enjoys all the benefits provided by British kuffar?

Well the truth is this little gem is nothing more than interpolation by persons unknown and more evidence that the Qur'an is a corrupted book

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to More Quraqnic disasters and this time ooops interpolation! by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)