2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Mistake Highlight

Reader comment on item: Hijabs on Western Public Women
in response to reader comment: More atrocious Arabic ...

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Nov 2, 2011 at 16:56

A wasted comment. It contained nothing. But it did highlight more mistakes of yours dhimmi.

------------------------------------------------------

No it is not al-maf3ool al-mutlaq

IF he did know Arabic - he might have understood it.

و متكلم حقيقة او لا؟

Is short for:

و متكلم تكلما حقيقة او لا؟

>He is a speaker, speaking really or not.

ROTFL You just wrote: and speaker (he) spoke truth or not! ya nahar eswid this is shameful and atrocious arabic and is the word takalama a verbal noun ...? Let me help you it is not it is a fi3l ...

--------------------------------------------------

If it was spoke truth - then "haqiqa "- would have had to agree in gender which it doesnt. That is to indicate it being mafool mutlaq. It is HAQIQATAN.

This really is getting absolute BASICS ARABIC wrong. Then again you did not even know that All masadir are Nouns. And to that you said "so what"

That is ur attitude - all mistake when highlighted .... "so what?"

What are u going to say now?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Mistake Highlight by Amin Riaz

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)