Basis for Concern of Righteous Theology Embedded in Search for Truth

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Mar 23, 2021 at 18:29

And again, an intriguing explanation by Dhimmi No More in one of the more elaborate sets of postings in this forum, almost as long as the ages old contest of whose theology will stand the test of time and whose will not last into eternity. We will not debate the winner of that contest; it will reveal itself in the time appointed, exactly when is has been predicted. But as has been demonstrated by Dhimmi No More, the same semantics of truth that caused the fallacies of debate, for example, regarding the validity of referring to the person of Yeshua as the 'Son of God,' a member of the Godhead in Scriptural references that even among so-called Christian circles is hard to defend for the lack of understanding in this forum, is shown to be hard to explain to those who have no clue Who the Christian 'Godhead' IS.
It is intriguing that there is more debate amongst the Islamists here about the truth of the Holy One of Israel than their attempt to identify their deity as being sufficient to stop the revelation of the Hebrew Holy Writ; therein lays the crux of the debate. They have been trying to stop the Gospel for centuries and in view of the reborn Israel, the message of whose theology is vindicated in Israel's existence.
Thanks again to Dhimmi No More.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".