DEFENSIVE FIGHTING IS NOT CONSIDERED BAD EH? THEN WE DESERVE TO PUNISH DESCENDANTS OF BABAR GHAZNI TAIMUR

Submitted by Proud Indian (India), Apr 28, 2009 at 01:18

Hey nozzie ,

I think you are a kindergarden teacher at your local madrassa. Do you think people fall for your DAWA?? You said to PLATO

Plato,if someone comes and burns your house, do you fight back so that to save your family? If you fight back so as to save your family, the fighting is considered to be good and not bad since someone starts his fighting first??

i want to ask you certain questions , I hope you answer them.

Did you know that your BARBARIC MUSLIM INVADERS , SACKED, LOOTED, MASSACRED AT LEAST 50 MILLION HINDUS / BUDDHISTS / INDEGENIOUS TRIBES / ORIGINAL SETTLERS OF SOUTH EAST ASIA?

HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT OF A REASON WHY ISLAM SPREAD SO FURIOUSLY IN ASIA? THE REASON IS SIMPLE: BY THE FEAR OF THE SWORD!

YOU WRITE

it implies that those muslims that fight back to protect their mosques to prevent people to attack them is correct since this will prevent non-muslims to burn down our holy mosque

AS PER YOUR OWN LOGIC, OUR TEMPLES / MONASTRIES / RELIGIOUS PLACES WERE DESECRATED BY ISLAMIC BARBARIANS ...

WARM REGARDS!!

PROUD INDIAN

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".