|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Footnote: Q112:2: al-Samad, Ashab al-Ayka and Ashab Layka and reading ancient texts that lack context.Reader comment on item: A Saudi Prince's Threat to the Obama Administration Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 14, 2021 at 07:44 Here is Q112:2: الله الصمد This can be rendered as: Allah al-Samad (notice that I left the word al-Samad untranslated because this word has no clear meaning) The grammar is perfect 3rd century of Islam Arabic grammar with مبتداء وخبر or "Subject and predicate" If we check al-Tabari's Tafsir we find the following: واختلف اهل التأويل في معنى الصمد (and this sentence is frequently The real question should be: Why would Muslims the likes of al-Tabari have no idea what the Qur'an is saying in the late second and early 3rd century of Islam? Michael Cook suggests that this could mean: 1. The Qur'an was "revealed" to Muhammad between 610 AD and 632 AD as we are told by the Islamic tradition. However, the Qur'an was not canonized yet. And by the 3rd century when al-Tabari wrote his masoretic exegesis the meaning of let us say al-Samad was lost 2. Or, the Quranic text pre-dates Muhammad and by 610 AD the meaning of the Quranic text was lost. Case in point is the so called Ashab al-Ayka or Ashab Layka tradition. Gerd Puin believes that al-Ayka is really Leuke Kome of the Petra area. And this city is mentioned in Greek literary sources several hundred years before the rise of Islam. However, by the 7th century the city acquired the Aramaic name Hawra (white in Aramaic and compare with Greek Leuke and Arabic al-Hawra). If any reader is interested to know more about the Ashab al-Ayka also Layka tradition, just let me know Next? على الهامش (writing notes in the margins of a text)
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". ![]() |
![]() Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2025 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |