2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Mangling the Arabic language again

Reader comment on item: Uncovering Early Islam
in response to reader comment: How the Quran was prepared...

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 31, 2014 at 08:52

Our dear Wasim is mangling the Arabic language again!

Lawh-e-Mehfuz'.

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic it is called al-Lawh al-Mahfouz

Whereas Muhammad explained that Allah is Zaat and Be-Niyaz (selflessness).

ROTFL there is no Arabic word called Niaz

But by doing Dajl

al-Dajal is you

they got accepted Allah as a personality. Through Gabriel they wanted to prove Muhammad as 'illiterate and unjust'.

But you see our dear Wasim the Qur'an is a literary disaster it is full of mistakes in grammar and syntax and spelling of perfect Arabic words which makes me believe that Abul Qasim aka Quthm must have been illiterate

Most of the scholars of today's world are Gumrah (mislead)

ROTFL there is an Atabic word called Gumrah? Let me guess this is Martian Arabic?

due to the knowledge of the history put forth by them. But, the honorable personalities of Supreme Court of America have appreciated the laws of Muhammad. That is,

Oh let me see ayat al-sayf! Is this just law our dear Wasim the lost tablighee?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Mangling the Arabic language again by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)