69 million page views

Victims of the Arabs and Islamic imperialism

Reader comment on item: Uncovering Early Islam
in response to reader comment: You are wrong

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 26, 2014 at 08:02

Our dear Adil Patel whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam and who is a follower of the bizarre al-Ahmadiyya is realizing that we kuffar can read the Islamic sources in Arabic something that our dear Adil cannot do right our dear Adil al-Tablighee?

Actually, we are supposed to call people to Islam, but Allah is the one who guides.

Really? so where would I find in let us say Q14:4 that your so called Allah says tablighees like you are supposed to become missionaries of Islam? you will not find it but you will find the likes of Q14:4 where it says that your so called Allah guide whom ever he wants and lead astray whom ever he wants so do you disagree with your so called Allah our dear Adil who lives among kuffar

I am not part of a tablighi Jama'.

Sure sure sure and I'm not really mother Teresa either

Allah says: "And we have not sent a messenger except that he speaks the same tongue as his people.

Well this means that

1. Your so called Allah sends a Rasul to a nation only if he speaks their language

2. Muhammad the PUBH spoke Arabic and his people were Hijzai Arabs

3. This is why Allah sent Muhammad to his people

4. We are told by the Ulama that your so called Allah sent 124,000 messengers to different nations

5. Your Hindu ancestors did not speak Arabic so Allah must have sent a Rasul to them that spoke their language be it Sanskrit or Urdu

6. So who was the rasul that was sent to your Hindu ancestors because he ain't Muhammad the PUBH

7. And no you will not find the name of Lord Krishna in the Qur'an as your fake idol Mirza Ghulam tells us

See? Sometimes silence is golden but tablighees like you are in the habit of making fools of themselves

If Islam is for Arabs only, why did the Prophet Muhammad send messages to the Kings of Egypt, Rome, and Persia?

Where is the historical evidence that Muhammad indeed sent letters? Let me help you there is none but you know what this means? If this story is true then Muhammad did not know what the Qur'an is really saying that Islam is the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only you think this happened because he was a big time jahil?

Surely they were not Arabs?

Sure they were not Arabs and this is why this story of the letters is a BOGUS story

Leave Islam and be free from the Arabs and their imperialism


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)