2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

FIGHT MIGHT NOT BE NECESSARILY IN VIOLENCE BUT BY WORDS

Reader comment on item: A Saudi Prince's Threat to the Obama Administration
in response to reader comment: Abdullah Ramla: Respect is a two-way street

Submitted by Mohamad Nozzi (Singapore), Apr 21, 2009 at 21:12

You mention thalt Allah is not existent and you call us to join fighting. However, fighting might not necessarily means that we must be use physical violence. We, educated people, use words to fight and that words are much stronger weapon to merely physical violence.

Now I commence my fight with you plato with words:

I could prove to you Allah really exists by the following statement:

You call yourself Plato by submitting the comments in this web-site. You should ask your mother since I have violence with your mother that your mother gives birth to you and that is why you call yourself Plato in this site. When I had violence with you, your mother ... However, your father is against me. And because of this, you like Muslims to fight. Bear in mind that I was not nasty to your mother but your mother was willing to let me satisfied.

I could prove to you that the above statement is true for the following factors:

a) Your parents must be angry with me after reading this statement.

b) You currently fill with angry and want to defend that I am wrong.

c) You encourage Muslims to fight.

If you could prove that the above statement is wrong, I could prove that Allah really exists. If you could not prove that the above statement is wrong, I will not prove to you that Allah really exist.

However, even though I do not provide proof that Allah really exists, Allah really exists. It is the same as you mention that the person that send comments and named himself Plato really exists and yet Plato says that he is non-existence.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to FIGHT MIGHT NOT BE NECESSARILY IN VIOLENCE BUT BY WORDS by Mohamad Nozzi

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)