69 million page views

quranic desecration

Reader comment on item: Amazon.com's Koran Desecration Problem

Submitted by James Derry (United States), May 20, 2005 at 11:49

Are the demands of Muslims for amazon.com to do so much unreasonable? yes.

is it just a coincidence that the incident follows the gitmo story? Not necessarily. It's easy to believe the desecrations took place as reported, but that the muslims didn't speak out, or speak out in wider public circles than their usual ones, until the Newsweek story broke.

interesting, too, how pipes describes the quran-abuse-in-gitmo story as old news, when the international red cross is reporting that it voiced its concerns about abuses of the quran in gitmo to military officials, then, if i've got my facts straight, noted a curtailing of such abuse, all of which lends credence to the observation that the abuses were real. As pointed out by a Newsweek editor, pentagon officials who read the Newsweek article before it went into print objected about the accuracy of other parts of the story, but not that part; and that objections weren't raised at all until the riots had broken out.

If Islam is to adapt to america, non-Muslim Americans (of which i am one) can at least strive to uphold the american ideal of showing -- if not respect, then -- tolerance for islam, which at a minimum would be not desecrating the quran, just as one should not desecrate the torah or bible.

And as a veteran of the US Cavalry and Texas national guard, i do expect more from my fellow warriors and their chain of command.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to quranic desecration by James Derry

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)