69 million page views

Two ways to stop Iran

Reader comment on item: Deterring Tehran

Submitted by Irving Weisdorf (United States), May 10, 2006 at 16:25

Sometimes I think that we who fancy ourselves intellectuals are the most hesitant to face reality. There is no substantive difference between what the Security Council is doing re Iran, than what they did re Iraq. There is no substantive difference between the Chinese and Russian strategy today than 4 years ago (namely, the weakening of the United States). ...

There are only two ways of stopping or slowing down Iran. One is target bombings, and the other is targeted assassinations. The latter might work at a minimal cost of life. Just think if someone had assassinated Hitler prior to 1939. There would probably be mountains of books written about how this was an undemocratic and uncivilized use of force. But 50 million people might have avoided being slaughtered by one side or the other.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)