69 million page views

More gem time from our dear Mansoor rabina yansuruhu akthar wa akthar

Reader comment on item: Resisting Islamic Law
in response to reader comment: Ultimate falsehood

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 7, 2008 at 07:03

Our dear mansoor wrote

>Madness has no boundaries and Falsehood has to perish.

And see who is talking

>You say Muslims could not convert Hindus and bring Muslims to majority?

Yes they could not even with the brutlaity of the likes of the wannabe Arab Mahmud of Ghazni against your own ancestors our dear Mansoor and do you know why? Could it be because there were too many Hindus? or could it be because the Muslims invaders realized that Islam is the religion of the Arabs only (remember: wa ma arsalna min rasulan ila bilisani qawmuhu. Oh silly me you do not know any Arabic but I refuse to translate any Arabic to wannabe Arabs like you) this means that those wannabe Arabs that wanted to become Muslims and join in the looting must become Arabs first. And this is why muslims have this al-wali wa al-mawali concept where an infidel or mawla becomes sponsored by an Arab wali and he becomes an Arab and then and only then can he convert to islam. Now with so many Hindus could it be that there were not many awlia' around? What do you think our dear mansoor? and how come you did not know that?

> very very very laughable.

What is very "laughable" your logic or is it your poor education or your realization that islam is nothing but Arabian imperialism? So which one is it?

> Your statement is a proof that Muslims didn't force others to accept their religion otherwise...

Wrong. It says in the Qur'an iqtoloo al-mushrikeen which means unless polytheists convert to islam they must be killed. So you must agree with me that at least in the case of the pagans of Mecca Islam was spread by the sword. Or are you disagreeing with your Allah the Arabian deity?

>The whole of India would be Muslim. In Europe, In Spain etc. Muslims never forced for conversion otherwise...everybody would be Muslim in every part of the world.

No infidels were a source of lots money not just from looting by Muslims but also they had to pay the jizya tax oh that mafia tax to Muslims. You think this could be the reason?

>You are very very wrong Mr.



Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)