5 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Excellent piece; and No, Paul Christopher is not right

Reader comment on item: Jihad and the Professors

Submitted by Averroes (Egypt), Nov 5, 2002 at 06:33

First, I'd like to express my admiration for this thorough, objective and credible article. Although I first heard about Mr. Pipes in some unfriendly report prepared by fellow Muslims in CAIR, I have this exhaustive article today as an evidence rather of Pipes' objectivity and credibility. Again although I personally have some reservations about his conclusions, his introductions go so deep and so honest this piece is worthy in the end of my respect and appreciation.

Some comments submitted on this article, however, I find not as deep or objective. They instead seem influenced by the same common preconceptions, mired in the same stereotypes against Islam and Muslims. When we for instance hastily reach a conclusion as immature as "now-we-know-our-enemy," we no longer read then or listen or search, nor do we try anymore to better understand what could be a much deeper crisis. With such an illusion, or a fact, of an enemy lying in ambush, one is only keen on having the gun not the idea, now troubled by rather hatred than ignorance, and led by more fears than morals.

However, for this isn't a Yahoo board of adrenaline-fueled adolescents, rather a forum of educated, rational and insightful commentators, writers and scholars with Ph.D. degrees, I find it a chance, perhaps a duty, to send you now my comment too, from the other side. And I'm in advance grateful for your time and consideration.

First, as for Jihad, I won't argue now about this concept in Islam, nor will I defend the original, authentic definition of Jihad as clearly set in our classics. To keep brief, also objective, I'd humbly agree and state, for now at least, that the primary meaning of Jihad involves military action and is never restricted to self-discipline or self-improvement. Now, I'd instead discuss the *presence* of the whole concept and ruling in today's Islam and in Muslims' everyday life, the world over.

In the wake of the dramatic assassination of Egypt's Sadat in 1981, two details were revealed, and both were quite significant in this regard.

The first detail was the secret book that one of the prominent leaders in that terrorist organization had written before they finally planned for their operation. This book, since prohibited of course, was significantly titled "The Absent Ruling," or in more accurate translation, "The Absent Duty." And that was simply the duty of Jihad in Islam.

With this in mind, I first claim that Jihad in fact, no matter what this word means, is a totally *absent* commitment when it comes to the mainstream, to the hundreds of millions of Muslims everywhere. Jihad may grab the world's attention though, but just like a Bin Laden does. CNN for instance has nothing to say about millions of Muslim professors, physicians, scientists, thinkers, writers, poets and musicians worldwide, while it has a lot to say and to say again about a single psychopathic Bin Laden. When a Bin Laden finally explains his motives, or rather his troubles, as Jihad, Jihad then becomes the hot topic, the primetime show and the bestseller title. Islam, consequently, is soon flattened, briefed and encapsulated to present only one of its so many dimensions and duties—ironically the *absent* one in particular. And Muslims finally, from the Nobel laureate to the cave inhabitant, are soon the terrorist "enemy."

That's why Muslims in general are simply silent. Those peoples, most of whom literally striving to merely survive, understand neither Ibn Taymiah's ruling nor Ibn Pipes' jargon—nor do they care to understand either. The word Jihad may however echo in their life or media, but when, and only when, Saddam Hussein's generals, for example, find them reluctant before Bush's Phantoms, or when Arafat's kids before Sharon's roaring tanks are so desperate they only want an excuse to die.

This leads me directly to the second significant detail in the assassination of Sadat. It was simply the word the chief assassin uttered directly before tearing the target body with more than 70 bullets. "We want only Pharaoh," Khalid al-Islambolli whispered.

The word ‘Pharaoh' in this context, in this culture, literally means "tyrant." They therefore didn't hurt or touch anyone else, seriously meant it and wanted only the tyrant.

Later in the Supreme Court, their educated lawyers would simply use every ruling of Jihad as a valid excuse for what they had done. Ibn Taymiah and al-Mawdoudi, the two Islamic jurists most Muslims today know nothing about, were the major names brought up from history to defend the heinous crime. Still, that earlier spontaneous word ‘Pharaoh' was enough for us today to expose it all and to clearly realize the real trouble behind that ironical act of ‘Jihad'. In one word, Sadat wasn't an infidel, but a tyrant; and it's all about politics, all about oppression and injustice.

Similarly, when Bin Laden strikes today, this in fact has nothing to do with Islam, no matter what he has to say and regardless of the primary meaning of Jihad and whether or not it necessarily involves military action. It's all about politics, all about oppression and injustice. If it were the call of Jihad, Bin Laden would simply choose much easier targets and humbler nations. Speaking of infidels, the pagans in Africa for example would certainly be the first target according to the original definition of Jihad, while the Christians of America would be the last ever, whose religion, Muslims believe, came from heaven as their Islam did, and whose Jesus, they do believe, is undeniably God's prophet.

Yet Bin Laden chose particularly America just like his brother 20 years earlier chose particularly Sadat. The United States to Bin Laden, actually to millions worldwide, is the Pharaoh, the tyrant who must fall. Bin Laden's case, therefore, is more political, social, cultural and psychological than religious. And as Americans have their misconceptions about Islam, Muslims too, and non-Muslims alike, have their misconceptions about America in particular and the west in general. This however isn't the point of my comment, by now, I beg your pardon, too long.

In conclusion, I first claim that Jihad as a ruling in Islam may be best investigated in this excellent article by Daniel Pipes, but as a German proverb says, "What's the point, what is the use of running if we are not on the right road?" This article is perfect for a historical study, but not at all if you mean to understand our reality, let alone deal with it.

Secondly, I claim that Bin Laden and all fellow fundamentalists in the Muslim world, who in total don't exceed 10% of the Muslim population according to a relatively recent study, may successfully justify their crimes as acts of Jihad, yet that's quite untrue. They are either rebels with their political agendas, or utopians whose reasons, no matter how worthy, have nothing to do with Islam. The least to say is that even if Jihad were a commitment present in Muslims' religion and life, no where in the entire religion of Islam would you find that murdering civilians is an act of Jihad—let alone occupying theaters or taking hostages.

I finally claim that the real danger in our world is rather this direct and indirect, present and implied ‘insistence' that Muslims are the enemy. An innocent question may rise in response to expose how meaningless, even paranoiac, this claim is: So what? World War III? Total genocide? Mass conversion? So what?

Sometimes it seems like it's not clear enough yet for everyone. We're not dealing today with a modern sect of bloody, disordered adolescents. We're not dealing with an occult, magical circle around which some tattooed teens are feverishly dancing. Fortunately or unfortunately, we're dealing with an international, major, fastest growing and richest 1400-year-old religion, culture and heritage, built by generations of awesome scholars and deepest jurists, believed by more than 1,200,000,000 people worldwide, 22% of the world's population, to be the perfect and final message from God to the world, no matter how you or I, or Daniel Pipes, define one of its terms.

After 911 attacks, Muslims in the States put the American flag in their cars, windows and shirts, directly and indirectly apologized, over and over again, for what they neither did nor even fully understood. Now if you insist those Muslims are the enemy, you in fact only insist on more and more Bin Ladens to be born. If you now insist this is but ‘Taqiyya' and deception, you simply leave no room for any Muslim to prove otherwise. And you only force them all to regard you as an enemy too, step back to their own identity, culture and heritage, then go adopt every Bin Laden's explanation why you should be killed really.

In other words, if you mean a better world for everyone, I'm sorry this isn't the way at all. Perhaps quite the opposite. It's first values and morals like Jefferson's that built this civilization and kept it despite every danger, and it's Jefferson's values and morals, not this general's plan or this businessman's insight, that we need most before every Bin Laden. "Not in my day, but at no distant one, we may shake a rod over the heads of all which may make the stoutest of them tremble. But I hope our wisdom will grow with our power and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be."

But if you only mean to burn the bad one we have, so keep up, God bless; nothing could be better than a new word on Jihad, reminding the poor and the desperate of their old duties.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (221) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
McLarney's book appears to be obfuscated antisemitism. [122 words]Michael SApr 13, 2016 10:46228938
study islam with an open mind [20 words]ahmedAug 20, 2008 12:37137064
3Madudi, prophet of genocidal theocracy...Keep an open mind? [218 words]DemocracyistheanswerDec 26, 2008 14:30137064
1an open mind.... my mind has been opened [60 words]PEMay 9, 2011 00:02137064
Mohammed shunned [76 words]abuOct 3, 2013 13:01137064
Only one correction-One Founder, Jefferson, Read the Koran and Saw Islam as a Threat [79 words]Mike ConlonMar 24, 2016 17:45137064
1There is no shame for an Arab to lie, steal, or murder [27 words]Ken BesigMay 2, 2008 05:46127424
To attack as best defence. [174 words]B. WilliameApr 29, 2008 10:12127163
1Response to Williams [105 words]SameerSep 10, 2008 08:35127163
A rose by any other name . . . [72 words]Rebecca MouldsApr 28, 2008 21:56127124
If all you have is faith... [250 words]justsomeguySep 11, 2007 18:59108595
Not believing in a god? [101 words]B. WilliameApr 29, 2008 10:18108595
1Jealousy - Islam [44 words]JohnSep 12, 2009 08:10108595
The Death of Islam [151 words]Thomas AdamsSep 8, 2007 08:44108261
The Truth Hurts [63 words]jennifer solisAug 24, 2007 17:22106923
2Islam Not Compulsory [431 words]Tony XMar 13, 2007 09:2786133
1please never misquote the holy prophet [62 words]twaha ismailMar 28, 2007 04:0886133
1This is all so sad... [127 words]Johan PetersSep 8, 2007 21:1486133
reply to fellow poster [926 words]markApr 30, 2008 08:2486133
war in Iraq [143 words]frankMar 5, 2007 23:1580470
Moslem people tell the truth pls [105 words]no nameeDec 21, 2005 09:5830342
Shocking [179 words]UserFeb 10, 2006 07:4130342
Recommended Reading [96 words]Sean FitzpatrickFeb 15, 2007 08:1430342
Response To: Moslem People tell the Truth [149 words]Tony XMar 13, 2007 09:3930342
jesus... [98 words]Muhammad SaleemNov 4, 2007 06:5930342
well actually... [165 words]Muhammad Saleem Sa'dan Al-LihaibNov 4, 2007 07:2030342
Christian prophesy [97 words]Linda HaslamMay 15, 2008 11:3730342
Islam [113 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiMay 25, 2008 19:4230342
Please Read This [433 words]Syed Muhammad Nizami (Pak Pride)Dec 8, 2005 19:3629678
Comment [12 words]N/AJan 20, 2006 20:2529678
2All Muslems are bad? [68 words]Hack MedDec 1, 2006 16:5429678
The ends do not justify the means. [310 words]nazerineJul 15, 2007 08:4429678
Read Sifoui and Faraj and following website for Taqiyya [372 words]Scott from SydneySep 30, 2005 08:4526488
Excellent piece; and No, Paul Christopher is not right [1582 words]AverroesSep 20, 2005 22:4526107
Blowing Themslves Up! [69 words]Louis FrielAug 24, 2005 22:0825083
stupid people [110 words]TylerSep 17, 2006 20:3925083
What A Scared AND Educated American wants to ask a Jihadist!! Please respond! [357 words]PaulAug 12, 2005 15:3424603
Response to Paul's Aug 12 2005 question [205 words]DonAug 13, 2005 20:2224603
1Jihadists are cowards [337 words]Jim McCollemApr 16, 2006 16:4224603
Thank You [15 words]Bubba SmithJun 22, 2006 09:1824603
a response to Jihadists are cowards by reader Jim McCollem [41 words]abdul nazirSep 17, 2006 16:4724603
forget it! [123 words]eliXelxSep 20, 2006 18:2324603
What are you... talking about? [35 words]Haider Al-Hac-medDec 1, 2006 16:5124603
Response to abdul nazir [238 words]Jim McCollemJan 15, 2007 19:4924603
NO Jihadists are basically KILLERS [5 words]JASON IN KY.Mar 28, 2007 09:2024603
U.K. GO GET WHAT IS YOURS [50 words]JASONMar 30, 2007 10:4624603
LOL [63 words]Angry AmericanNov 28, 2007 11:2024603
Ask Guidance from God Alone through Correct Methods [309 words]TalhahMay 19, 2008 09:3724603
Muhammad [119 words]NomorecowardsMay 23, 2017 00:4324603
London Attacks [20 words]UserJul 17, 2005 06:1123534
Dr. Taha Jabir Al-`Alawani [136 words]MeredithJun 12, 2005 00:4022644
Anti-Catholicism [442 words]Robert J.Jun 1, 2005 09:5822508
1Clarification re Crusades [140 words]Ruth McNultyMay 20, 2005 21:2322246
Islamist Terrorists are Cowardly and Weak [97 words]GooseFeb 23, 2005 00:5420480
Ask the Serbs what Jihad means [225 words]NickJan 31, 2005 14:3820013
what world you' living in? [229 words]RJul 11, 2006 16:0320013
2Jihad is "Mein Kampf" [80 words]Mark McMurtreyDec 16, 2004 17:5419026
Response to comment by Mr. McMurtrey regarding "uneducated Islamists" [240 words]Frank F.Feb 15, 2005 13:1719026
Well said [28 words]Mark McMurtreyApr 3, 2006 19:5919026
Uneducated [61 words]Mark McMurtreyOct 4, 2006 18:1719026
c'est giscart qui en est en partie responsable !! [254 words]DavidNov 6, 2004 13:5318116
Islamic extremists...living in the 14th century [178 words]Mike MillaredNov 4, 2004 13:3518096
UBL's Interpretation of Islam [93 words]Weldon SmithMay 11, 2004 23:0515158
the world as a whole [119 words]buzzkillMay 11, 2004 22:5515157
Jihad the way I see it [154 words]The IraqiApr 24, 2004 09:1814853
Religion? [106 words]DamienMar 22, 2004 06:4314287
With you all the way,but how can I get other Australians to read it? [49 words]Ralph RoseFeb 10, 2004 22:3013834
If I'm a hostile non-Muslim, so be it. [31 words]Ricky D. CalhounFeb 2, 2004 11:5913669
simple truth for simple minds [140 words]alla peanut butter sandwichSep 14, 2006 01:5013669
Reply [35 words]Kaiser NizamaniJan 12, 2004 11:1713305
crusades were really a counterattack against aggresion [70 words]steve bridges retired US army officer and HistorianJan 5, 2004 22:4713148
I SAY START ALL OVER [51 words]JASONMar 28, 2007 09:3813148
The problem with "Taking what's Yours" [328 words]James McCollemMay 28, 2007 13:5713148
The Religion of Hitler and Slobo [133 words]noelJan 4, 2004 23:0313102
Hitler as Christian is a Myth [172 words]MarkJan 19, 2008 14:5413102
Question rather than comment [93 words]Jerrold A. WeissmanJan 4, 2004 13:5613088
Jihad [68 words]Sufyaan AhmadNov 22, 2003 09:2612265
Jihad is NOT justified [24 words]rickyAug 18, 2003 19:0110624
1Crusades, the truth! [75 words]BillAug 6, 2003 16:2610464
Islam is but one religion [140 words]Abu MuhsinJun 5, 2003 19:289405
Jihad is not terrorism! [55 words]Ramadan AlkhazrajyJun 5, 2003 19:029403
RE: Jihad is not terrorism! [147 words]World CitizenMar 18, 2007 20:399403
Jihad is justified [230 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
WaheedMay 16, 2003 06:589103
Waheed is wrong [277 words]TedJul 1, 2003 16:489103
Waheed can't take the blame. [117 words]ABFeb 10, 2004 18:539103
all muslim countries are doing jihad [77 words]kaifOct 6, 2007 07:349103
Prophet Jeremiah [132 words]MWhittonApr 8, 2003 00:318132
Question for Islamic Religious Leaders [19 words]Tom JamesMar 31, 2003 13:307813
One man's self-defense is another man's predilection [248 words]Giovanni PlattiMar 1, 2003 01:196986
Reply to Giovanni Platti- Religion is the culprit [458 words]Adeel AhmedMar 25, 2003 03:046986
That's not accurate [88 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiMay 25, 2008 19:486986
Fox News [87 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiMay 25, 2008 19:526986
about this [103 words]tom2000Feb 17, 2009 09:196986
1Religion is the culprit [42 words]NeutroFeb 1, 2003 21:476245
Comment on Mr K. Ahmed's Posting [136 words]Jamal K.Jan 28, 2003 17:086070
Jihad is a plane full of civilians crashing into a building. [101 words]Moti GivoniJan 18, 2003 21:595850
Thank you Daniel [57 words]Peter EdgarJan 6, 2003 20:285529
excellent [25 words]Paul Alkebulan, doctoral candidate in history, University of California, BerkeleyDec 31, 2002 12:245330
Jihad and Academicians [812 words]Jean E. RosenfeldDec 27, 2002 12:255167
Clear thinking on Jihad [125 words]A non-MoslemDec 25, 2002 00:485127
1From a Hindu - "Jihad", "Dharma", "Struggle" [190 words]Anjali KumarDec 20, 2002 11:204988
True meaning of Jihad [211 words]MahdiNov 19, 2002 08:534013
Unflinching analysis [178 words]Rick BrightNov 19, 2002 05:064010
Abrogating and Arogated Verses of Quran [160 words]N. KhanNov 18, 2002 13:443998
What Jihad means [91 words]Shantilal DandNov 17, 2002 17:203989
1Dagger of Islam [74 words]Ephraim IsraelNov 17, 2002 07:223981
1Al Islam Means total submission to the will of Allah (G-D [50 words]Wali A AliApr 22, 2007 08:403981
Jihad, A Master Stroke [82 words]Nazia K.Nov 15, 2002 17:293949
Jihad : a blessing and a curse [364 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Katy BelangerNov 14, 2002 13:153911
Crusades [47 words]FLASH91Nov 14, 2002 12:353910
Good work Daniel! [54 words]Abu MusabNov 14, 2002 08:333904
The meaning of jihad [22 words]Gary NewmanNov 14, 2002 02:063897
Something To Think About [229 words]Nan SnyderNov 12, 2002 16:513795
It is not about religion! [77 words]Jacob HatcherNov 11, 2002 19:523775
UBL's Links? [25 words]PPNov 10, 2002 12:573759
What did the Harvard student Yasin mean by Justice? [78 words]R. SinghNov 10, 2002 05:563750
Another answer for R. Singh, November 10, 2002 at 06:13 [304 words]Ms SmithJul 4, 2003 18:123750
From an Arabic speaking person [157 words]A. AhmadoNov 9, 2002 04:383739
Jihad in its extreme form [238 words]Radhakrishna VarmaNov 9, 2002 01:463737
When investigating Islam, go to the source [596 words]FouzanNov 8, 2002 21:283733
More Jihad definitiions [69 words]Bernard FreedmanNov 6, 2002 05:563679
Jihad [90 words]Bernard FreedmanNov 6, 2002 04:323677
Alfred Morabia [16 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jonathan WilnerNov 5, 2002 20:503661
Concerns about Pipes' observations [385 words]Dr. Irfan AlladinNov 5, 2002 20:143660
Jihad [95 words]Bernard FreedmanNov 5, 2002 19:393656
The bigger the lie, the more it is accepted... [41 words]Bernard FreedmanNov 5, 2002 17:483647
Religious intolerance [131 words]G. SinghNov 5, 2002 15:483629
A lone sane voice speaking truth through the fog of Political Correctness [33 words]PrakashNov 5, 2002 12:153619
Dhimmitude Studies, Please! [158 words]EvaNov 5, 2002 12:053616
Foreseeable Destruction [86 words]"JB" in PGHNov 5, 2002 11:083614
Bat Ye'or [28 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Edith ShakedNov 5, 2002 10:263613
Excellent piece; and No, Paul Christopher is not right [1590 words]AverroesNov 5, 2002 06:333607
Fifty Years of Explaining Away the Evils of Our Enemies [32 words]Jeremy FreedmanNov 5, 2002 05:083606
Jihad in source texts [65 words]Jon PaulNov 5, 2002 05:043605
"International" terrorism is an euphemism for Islamic terror [54 words]Michael CraneNov 5, 2002 03:283604
A Correction [62 words]J. KhanNov 4, 2002 18:453601
Calls for "Jihad" Continue in Palestine [114 words]John ReindersNov 4, 2002 16:433599
Actions speak louder than words. [288 words]Vincent HartungNov 4, 2002 13:153593
Professors and breach of public trust [290 words]Frank G. Zavisca, M.D., Ph.D.Nov 4, 2002 12:483592
Redefining jihad [131 words]Alan SullivanNov 4, 2002 12:013589
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder [63 words]DNNov 4, 2002 11:253587
New Academy [175 words]Wes HullNov 4, 2002 10:223585
Sinecured "faculty" [94 words]SedarNov 4, 2002 08:023582
Should Arab-Americans volunteer for US armed forces? [582 words]Ted RoseNov 4, 2002 02:283578
Showed loyalty [90 words]TOMASMay 13, 2014 09:563578
Politics and the Arabic Language [151 words]George McFaddenNov 4, 2002 01:043575
Dr. Pipes, what should we do? [29 words]JamesNov 3, 2002 17:033569
Harvard profs whitewash jihad [68 words]Barry WoodNov 3, 2002 15:053565
History tells [128 words]Jean MartinNov 3, 2002 14:313564
Thank You [17 words]David BatteauNov 2, 2002 21:113547
Let's understand Jihad [488 words]K AhmedNov 2, 2002 21:093546
A Greatly Needed Account [93 words]KathleenNov 2, 2002 19:483542
Clueless? [208 words]T. HelemNov 2, 2002 17:453539
In defense of anti-intellectualism rightfully understood [144 words]David ThomsonNov 2, 2002 17:243537
But, Dr. Pipes... [104 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jim RyanNov 2, 2002 16:303536
The "true" meaning of "jihad" [69 words]S. Matthew PrasteinNov 2, 2002 15:543534
Jihad Is What It Does [189 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryNov 2, 2002 15:073531
Mr. Yasin tells the truth... [108 words]Jim StanleyNov 2, 2002 14:263530
Jihad and the Saudis [134 words]TomNov 2, 2002 14:193529
Jihad is mainly fighting [34 words]GGNov 2, 2002 13:263527
Despite Personal Risk! [17 words]Mike AksmanNov 2, 2002 12:253526
Dr. Pipes & the accurate meaning of 'Jihad' [63 words]TW ChildsNov 2, 2002 11:103525
Thanks for doing what you do [51 words]John BentleyNov 2, 2002 09:363524
Warlike and imperialistic. [94 words]HerbNov 2, 2002 08:553523
Jihad and its spread [319 words]Joseph GoldhiemannNov 2, 2002 07:103521
2Taqiyya and the Myth of Moderate Islam [226 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Paul ChristopherNov 2, 2002 04:153518
Paul Christopher is right [146 words]MontyNov 3, 2002 04:063518
Well said, Monty. [234 words]CowboyNov 3, 2002 15:453518
Do I have to look at the white teeth of Mohammed when I read this: [427 words]van ChapmanOct 23, 2006 07:363518
Sunnis use taqiyya too [58 words]paul christopherJun 20, 2007 05:573518
Academic Jihad [190 words]Arlinda DeAngelisNov 2, 2002 02:383516
Three Islamic websites worth checking [180 words]Karsten BraschNov 2, 2002 01:563515
what's your point [67 words]john smith rogue, Ph.D. J.D.Jul 7, 2003 11:593515
All Religions [74 words]FredFeb 15, 2006 09:233515
Not surprised [225 words]JimMay 26, 2006 14:113515
Let Them Have Their Bomb [1042 words]Rick PolandJun 20, 2006 14:153515
Hey ! Osama read this to your Mama [338 words]Heald HillFeb 11, 2007 22:233515
1st amendment rights [56 words]We Try Not To CensorSep 7, 2007 17:043515
The PR War [137 words]CD WomackSep 7, 2007 19:243515
Islamic girls [52 words]NajahAug 23, 2008 10:513515
Irrational interpretation of the Quran [38 words]William J FisherSep 11, 2010 13:493515
Bin Laden read this.... [75 words]crusaderMay 7, 2011 21:563515
Courage and Truth about Jihad [239 words]Georgia Franklin-ShutanNov 2, 2002 00:273511
1C.A.I.R. IN D.C. [181 words]DON SULEYSep 23, 2006 23:103511
Is c.a.i.r going to speak out against ben-laden if you're asked to? [19 words]jasonMar 26, 2007 12:053511
Militant Islam & The Month of October [86 words]ScottNov 1, 2002 23:473510
Thanks For Truthful Article [16 words]Joshua DavisNov 1, 2002 23:283509
Jihad? [87 words]Eli StarrNov 1, 2002 21:463506
Reply to commenter Eli Starr [82 words]KenNov 5, 2002 15:373506
Perfect Definition [209 words]RDNov 1, 2002 19:253502
Price of freedom is eternal vigilance [112 words]WWillNov 1, 2002 18:523500
Identity and Reality [142 words]Steve SaafNov 1, 2002 18:143499
Jihad: Straight from the horse's mouth. [333 words]Imran KhanNov 1, 2002 17:253498
Call it Jihad... or not [17 words]George ValdshteinNov 1, 2002 17:113497
A cystal clear analysis and defintion of Jihad and Jihadists [61 words]RachterryNov 1, 2002 16:463496
The truth about "Jihad" [104 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
A MuslimNov 1, 2002 16:373495
Bravo! [29 words]R. Delfin, Ph.D.Nov 1, 2002 16:273494
A little truth on the other side? [217 words]Richard BoltuckNov 1, 2002 16:273493
Response to commenter Richard Botluck [153 words]Karsten BraschNov 2, 2002 01:333493
Response to comment "A little truth on the other side?" [63 words]Glyn CarpenterNov 2, 2002 22:573493
Jihad on a current Islamic web site!! [338 words]Imran KhanNov 1, 2002 15:553492
regarding the comment: from Imran Khan [248 words]JayDec 29, 2005 17:433492
Why is Indonesia over 90% Muslim? [199 words]Imran KhanNov 1, 2002 15:363491
Answer to Imran Khan [93 words]ChronoNov 2, 2002 19:343491
Is Imran Khan serious? [657 words]John PhilipsNov 4, 2002 04:343491
Correction to Chrono's Answer. [66 words]Imran KhanNov 4, 2002 14:123491
Another answer for commenter Imran Khan [294 words]R. SinghNov 10, 2002 06:133491
To Mr. R.Singh [210 words]Billy LuftzAug 23, 2005 12:463491
To Billy Luftz [547 words]Zoravar SinghSep 8, 2005 13:463491
an observation [87 words]Raju nagaApr 20, 2007 21:223491
Analogy to Crusade is Brilliant [30 words]DavidNov 1, 2002 14:313484
Militant Islam suffers from itself [239 words]SheerahkahnNov 1, 2002 14:173483
The truth about "jihad" [73 words]Michael JoyceNov 1, 2002 14:163482
A magnum opus piece, Mr. Pipes! [37 words]George ShapiroNov 1, 2002 14:153481
Inexpressable Gratitude for Dr. Pipes' Courage [335 words]SusanNov 1, 2002 14:123480
Jihad how far Spiritual [238 words]R S PatilApr 10, 2008 11:333480
Courage, Perseverance and Truth [102 words]Cubby S.Nov 1, 2002 13:273477
'Jihad-lite' - less filling, more tasteful [94 words]Chuck MundyNov 1, 2002 12:513476
Meaning of Jihad [99 words]David PtersNov 1, 2002 12:443475
Jihad Sounds a lot like "Mein Kampf" [38 words]Steven HessNov 1, 2002 12:333474
The truth about "jihad" [80 words]Carey E. Stronach, Ph.D.Nov 1, 2002 12:253473

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Excellent piece; and No, Paul Christopher is not right by Averroes

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)