69 million page views

Dr. Pipes, please define "moderate Muslims"

Reader comment on item: A Million Moderate Muslims on the March

Submitted by Nahum Kipnis (United States), May 8, 2007 at 15:52

Dr. Pipes offers recent large demonstrations in Turkey and Pakistan as proving an existence of a significant number of "moderate Muslims."

However, the articles which he cites as evidence don't mention such a concept at all. In Turkey, the marchers wanted to preserve a secular state. Even the slogans cited by Dr. Pipes himself show this: "We don't want an imam as president," "We respect belief, but not radicalism," and "Turkey is secular and will stay secular!" Note, they don't want ANY imam, not just a radical one.

The party that organized the rally in Karachi - Mutahida Qaumi Movement - is a secular rather than a Muslim party. Indeed, it describes itself as "a true democratic, liberal and progressive political party, which is the sole representative of educated middle class masses, minorities and have-nots." (http://www.mqm.com) Its documents do not mention Islam at all.

Do we have a definition problem? I apologize if I missed Dr. Pipes' definition of the "moderate Muslim" and I ask him to repeat it. As one of the slogans cited above - "We respect belief, but not radicalism" - shows, there may be different interpretations of the "moderate Muslim." One is a believer who opposes terror. This is a possible interpretation of Koran. Another is a person brought up in a Muslim family but who became a "'non-practicing Muslim." He would deny, for instance, that a modern state shall be subjected to sharia law. Apparently, the Turks mentioned by Dr. Pipes are of this kind.

The problem is that the term "non-practicing Muslim" is a contradiction in itself. Such a person is simply not religious. If Dr. Pipes means this group under "moderate Muslims," his definition is meaningless. If Dr. Pipes means real Muslims (religious) who oppose terror, then I have a question for him. By their own definition, Muslims believe that their lives are to be governed by sharia. Dr. Pipes, do you support such a request as applied to a Muslim community in any country? If you do, what is your solution for cases when sharia law contradict the state law?

Best regards,

Nahum Kipnis


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)