2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Response to Shri Proud Indian Jee

Reader comment on item: Is Turkey's Government Starting a Muslim Reformation?
in response to reader comment: Shabana Azmi, Mohammad Azzharruddin, Salman Khan, They are all the same.

Submitted by s.p. attri (United States), Aug 27, 2008 at 02:10

Subj: Response to Shri Proud Indian Jee

Submitted by Proud Indian (India), Aug 25, 2008 at 03:14

Dear Attriji,

I would like to comment on the post which you have posted. It is common amongst muslims to put forth their minority status whenever they do something wrong and are caught for it! It is people like Shabana Azmi who shamelessly parade the "minority" card whenever her community comes under any investigative agency's perview or forment trouble.

Case i) Mohammad Azharruddin served as India's cricket captian for 10 years.. we all loved his game and i am sure the cricketers wouldn't have hesitated to play under this muslim! but the day he was caught for hobnobbing with bookies and accepting cash to throw away matches, he was banned!!! what did he do? come up with the statement that he was victimised because he was muslim!

...he conviniently forgot that even hindus like AJAY JADEJA, NAYAN MONGIA, MANOJ PRABHAKAR, were banned.. and does he think that BCCI was ignorant that he was not a muslim before they made him the captain of INDIA? who was he fooling?

Case 2) Salman Khan was jailed for hunting an endangered species of deer.. guess was did he do?? started reading the koran and wore a skull cap whenever he was taken to court.. He instantly was made a poster boy of the "wronged muslim"

...if the majority of the indian population i.e hindus, flock to theatres to see his movies.. they pay hard earned money to see their superstar on the big screen. I am sure he doesn't mind.., but when he is incarcerated for a crime, he immediately becomes a muslim who has been framed by the majority!

Shabana Azmi claims that she was denied a place in mumbai because she was muslim? has she gone nuts? no society wants film celebrities to stay in their localities.. we had one in our locality and we were fed up with the late night parties and starry brawls which use to take place. .. not to mention incessant fans and c grade news channels looking for a sound byte make life a hell... So if a locality bans film personalities then even hindus actors and actresses find it difficult to find a place.

No one minds an Azim Premji,our ex president APJ Abdul Kalam Azad staying but actors? no way.. to top it off loud mouths like shabana azmi? NOT WORTH..

Thats why i say.. radicals are dangerous but people like shabana azmi are the wolves in the sheep's clothing

regards,

Proud Indian

1. My Take:

Shri Proud Indian Jee:

I concur with you.

2. Quote:

COMMENT: Yes, they do parade the Minority-Card, but this card is as phoney, as a three dollar bill.

3. Quote:

COMMENT: Mohammad Azharruddin is throwing a smoke-screedn, game-playing to avoid being nailed down. It is a cowardly act, to avert responsibility for misdeeds.

4. Quote:

...if the majority of the indian population i.e hindus, flock to theatres to see his movies.. they pay hard earned money to see their superstar on the big screen. I am sure he doesn't mind.., but when he is incarcerated for a crime, he immediately becomes a muslim who has been framed by the majority!

COMMENT: Wearing a Persecution-Cap ( for being a Minority-Muslim ) is an ingenious trick. It comes in handy, to get the sympathies of the court & of the press. Salman Khan may not have any use for the Hindu Religion, but he loves the Hindu-Money. It makes him laugh all the way to the bank.

5. Quote:

COMMENT: Shabana needs to look at the broad picture. Islam has spread through sword & coercion. It hardly cares for the human mind, it cares even less for Kafir's life. Islam's tolerance of Kafir religions is Nill. Islam's Moslems are always trouble-makers, for people who do not subscribe to their evil ideology of Islam. Islam's concept of religion is the destruction of Non-Moslem religions & Non-Moslem people ( the Kafirs ). Moslems have never learned that they need to co-exist, with Non-Moslem religions & people. They are not likely to undergo any behavior change either, because their Islam tells them that Kafirs are the most Wretched people, fit only for the fires of Hell. Islam & Moslems reputation follows wherever they go.

Who would want such an obnoxious religion ( & person subscribing to this doctrine ) in his house or in his neighborhood ? Hindus are being defensive. Shabana ought to put herself in the other guy's shoes.

She is not being logical. She is acting like... dirtying the place, where she resides.

Surinder Paul Attri

Shabana Azmi claims that she was denied a place in mumbai because she was muslim? has she gone nuts? no society wants film celebrities to stay in their localities.. we had one in our locality and we were fed up with the late night parties and starry brawls which use to take place. .. not to mention incessant fans and c grade news channels looking for a sound byte make life a hell... So if a locality bans film personalities then even hindus actors and actresses find it difficult to find a place.Case 2) Salman Khan was jailed for hunting an endangered species of deer.. guess was did he do?? started reading the koran and wore a skull cap whenever he was taken to court.. He instantly was made a poster boy of the "wronged muslim"Case i) Mohammad Azharruddin served as India's cricket captian for 10 years.. we all loved his game and i am sure the cricketers wouldn't have hesitated to play under this muslim! but the day he was caught for hobnobbing with bookies and accepting cash to throw away matches, he was banned!!! what did he do? come up with the statement that he was victimised because he was muslim!I would like to comment on the post which you have posted. It is common amongst muslims to put forth their minority status whenever they do something wrong and are caught for it! It is people like Shabana Azmi who shamelessly parade the "minority" card whenever her community comes under any investigative agency's perview or forment trouble.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Response to Shri Proud Indian Jee by s.p. attri

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)