1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Suggestion for an article for Dr. Pipes

Reader comment on item: [Pew Poll on] How Muslims Think
in response to reader comment: Gullible West

Submitted by Kevin M (United States), Jul 4, 2006 at 09:14

This may be slightly off-topic, but in my reviews of this site and others dealing with Islam, two terms are frequently mentioned and discussed: Al-Taqiya and kitman. Each has been given a number of definitions, but they all deal with the philosophy or policy of deception and deceit.

Having lived in Saudi Arabia as an expat worker for four years, I experienced countless instances in which my Saudi co-workers and students made unambiguous statements which were later denied, refuted and proven false. Frankly, I was lied to on a daily basis and came to the conclusion that, for one reason or another, Muslims (perhaps only Saudis, though I doubt it), considered the spoken work to be of little consequence, particularly when in conversation with a non-believer.

Dr. Pipes's expertise in this matter prompts me to suggest he compose an article or web log detailing the history or background of Taqiya and kitman. Most of the other web sites are either Muslim-apologist in nature, or rather biased in their contempt for Islam. Something more balanced and scholarly would be, in my view, a welcomed contribution to the current discourse.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

These are complex and somewhat elusive concepts. I will keep it in mind to work on them. In the meantime, see my comments at "Al-Taqiya."

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Suggestion for an article for Dr. Pipes by Kevin M

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)