69 million page views

For Mustapah: Anbiya and ambiya (sic) and Muslim logic part deux

Reader comment on item: [Pew Poll on] How Muslims Think
in response to reader comment: For dhimmi no more

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 18, 2006 at 07:06

My dear Moustapha your post betrays your total ignorance of the Arabic language, writing, grammar and now vocalization.

There is nothing in the Arabic language called salihatul (or whatever) hadith!!! This might be a pakistani invention but it is not even close to being good Arabic.

Then you wrote: "please any where you see 'alifun (this really betrays your total ignorance of the Arabic alphabet. The letter alif is called: ALIF. You do not apply 'Irab to a letter, which I suspect you would have no clue what it really means or when to use it. It is alif!!!!) .

Then you wrote: "...nunun": you are kidding me. It is nuun. There is no letter in the Arabic alphabet called nunun unless you know no Arabic.

Then you wrote: "followed by ba'un" what on earth is ba'un? Well may be it is what they teach you in your pakistani madrassa but there is no such a thing as ba'un in Arabic.

For the readers: the Arabic word Nabi or prophet and is written as follows: nuun, beh, yeh and plural is anbiya and for this see Hans Wehr Arbic dictionary page: 941B

Also notice that Moustapha never addressed the fact that his Allah claims that the plural of Nabi is nabiyyin which is very poor Arabic garmmar. But wait: it could be that Allah or Muhammad or Gabriel or all there of them had no clue about good Arabic grammar.

Then you wrote: "...anywhere you see alifun (sic) nunun (sic) followed by ba'un (sic) read it as AMB not ANB.."

To the readers: Now Mustapha discovered that he has been exposed and that the plural of Nabi is Anbiya and not ambiya as he claimed. Then he comes back and claims that this is the vocalization of the word anbiya. And yes the Arabic language has some vocalization rules like any other language but AMB for ANB is not one of them, The classical example is the case of lam shamsiyya and lam qamariyya rule so the word Sun is written as: al-shams but it is vocalized as: ash-shams where the lam letter disappears. The word Moon is: al-qamar and it is vocalized as: al-qamar. So you see the lam letter disappearing or not depending on the letter following the lam.

To the careless listener the word Anbiya might sound like ambiya but it is vocalized as: anbiya period.

Then Moustapha is lost. He does not know what the word dhimmi means. Then he writes: ahlud dhimma! I have no idea what this means.

My dear Mustapha: A dhimmi is a non Muslim who lives lives in some Islamic hell hole. I have never been a Muslim, and do not wish to be one or to ever be a dhimmi for this matter.

Now here is the difference between us:

1. I know the Arabic language, grammar, vocalization and all, very well. You do not.

2. I can read your Allah's book in Arabic and understand it. You cannot.

3. I read primary Muslim/Arabic sources in Arabic and kuffar scholarly work, and you do not.

And then you come here pretend to know Arabic and push the religion of the Arabs that brutalized your ancestors? Shame!!!

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to For Mustapah: Anbiya and ambiya (sic) and Muslim logic part deux by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)