69 million page views

Obvious Contradictions of Why Religion Cannot Rule in Government

Reader comment on item: Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too
in response to reader comment: Things Done in the Name of Religion That Betrays Why Religion Cannot Serve Justice to a God That Requires Service in Love

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Sep 21, 2022 at 17:21

Afterthought: Why did this woman need to die?
The perpetrators have no practical answer, since doing it in the name of religion cannot cover the crime they committed. If the current regime that permitted such activities cannot provide the relevant motivation beyond an extremists' perception of morality, where does the extended complicity lay?
Even in America, where religion and morality are at odds with each other, this would not be solved by adopting an extreme posturing just to prove the superiority of one over the other, no matter the extent of belief. That is the missing component in America perpetions of such. It is obviously more potent in the Iranian Islamic Regime's perception of religious governmental power.
It is beyond the human sense of rational conduct.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)