69 million page views

Mumin Salih and the argument that has a kidney failure

Reader comment on item: Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too
in response to reader comment: Hijab is more sinister than burqa or niqab

Submitted by Harrak (Canada), Aug 5, 2007 at 09:27

Given the Mumin Salih baseless points for the sake of argument, then why not banning the Sikhs Turbans! do not the non-turbaned Sikhs feel intimidated by those who are turbaned!! How about the Jewish ladies who carry a scarf on their head like Muslims!! Even some Muslim women carry Jewish scarf style in North Africa..what! ban the Dread Locks for Rasta too!! because they intimidate bold-head Rastas..Your argument has a kidney failure Sir!! need to take it to emergency room. If in your state the heath care is private, then how many like you have kidney failed arguments in your nation!! I wonder..


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)