1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Arguments of negation are deceptive and in this case delusional

Reader comment on item: Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too
in response to reader comment: Burqas, Niqabs, etc.

Submitted by Abu Nudnik (United States), Aug 3, 2007 at 00:38

"Are we really worried about a burqa as a security threat ?"

Yes, I am, even if you aren't and you aren't "we" any more than I am "we." Dr. Pipes has elucidated the security threat with several examples.

"Aren't we concerned about it because it signifies that the person wearing a burqa is identifying herself as a member of some "other" group not ours ?"

The security risk, both in terms of criminal actions, flight, terrorism, election fraud and the rest does not disappear just because there may be other less honourable reasons to oppose the burqa. And by the way, what makes you think the person wearing the burka is a "her?"

"Do we interpret the wearing of a burqa as a statement that the wearer doesn't want to be one of us, doesn't like us enough to want to be one of us ?"

Even if it were so, the security risk still exists.

Mr. Goodman calls all Pipes' opposition to the hiding of the face a red herring and in the three examples above has adequately demonstrated what a red herring is.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Arguments of negation are deceptive and in this case delusional by Abu Nudnik

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)