69 million page views

headgear isn't the issue

Reader comment on item: Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too
in response to reader comment: why the headgear...

Submitted by Pat (United States), Aug 3, 2007 at 07:44

While I don't entirely disagree, I do think you are overstating it.

At least until the 1960s many Catholic nuns wore long black habits and a head covering. I don't know if any orders still do. In the 1970s most nuns in one order had gone to civilian dress but some in the same order wore a modified habit, consisting of a knee-length dress and short hair covering. It was their choice.

I have seen Muslim men in shorts and short sleeves accompanying a woman in full garment and head covering in ninety-degree weather. They stand out. I consider it cruel but who am I to judge? The issue is not so much how Muslims dress as it is whether some customs deserve protection as a religious practice and whether we should allow those customs to be used to subvert our security.

Maybe they are pressed by their culture but American Muslims have a freedom they wouldn't have in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan. We saw a woman who wanted to wear the niqab for her photo id. If she truly respected Islamic law wouldn't she have passed on driving altogether? For me the question is less whether Muslim men or women respect one another as it is whether or not they respect those with whom they have chosen to live. I would prefer that Muslims in Western societies adopt Western norms. This doesn't mean changing their diets or giving up the mosque. People everywhere in America have a great deal of leeway in choosing what eat and what to wear. It means accepting a set of rules for public behavior. This is where the niqab and burkha do great damage. They only foster distrust.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to headgear isn't the issue by Pat

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)