|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
on Bin QasimReader comment on item: Hold Damascus Responsible Submitted by on Bin Qasim (India), Sep 3, 2006 at 23:34 not sure about the views of your Pakistani Hindu Sindhi historian. but Sindh was attacked multiple times before it fell. so abducting women is not the only reason for the attack. it also doesnt seem likely that pirate activities should invite mass killing of Hindu male population that followed after Sindh fell. but of course there will be many views on any event in history. usually the most predominant would be the one of the winner. thats no reason why one should believe it though. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||