1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Clarification on "Genozides"

Reader comment on item: Islamist Turkey vs. Secular Iran?
in response to reader comment: at least 2 omissions!

Submitted by Michel C. Zala (Switzerland), Jan 3, 2011 at 10:32

I absolutely agree with GIK in that most of those listed atrocities were committed by authoritarian, totalitarian and repressive regimes, which is , why I currently find myself in a heated debate with Banerjee further above.

Just to make myself absolutely clear: the point of my post was not to compare the muslim world with the western world in terms of atrocities, but to make the argument that such authoritarian systems could be found literally on every corner of the world and a "comparison" of genozides, pointing the finger at the Turks alone, was a futile argument. Neither Mao, nor Stalin or Hitler stood alone. They were - hard to admit - supported actively and passively by a lot of sympathizers. There is collective guilt. There is guilt by association.

If you however make the point that Islam by sheer nature is authoritarian, no dissent, debate and opposition can be allowed, thus islamist regimes of the likes of Iran pose a grave threat to engage in such atrocities, I will certainly concur.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Clarification on "Genozides" by Michel C. Zala

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)