Reply to Steven Abrams
Reader comment on item: Conservative Professors, an Endangered Species

Submitted by Peter J. Herz (Taiwan), Apr 13, 2005 at 05:58

"Superstitious and anti-scientific"--is this a value judgment I hear?

Give me a scientific reason why we should not cheat and lie to advance our careers, keep our hands out of others' pockets if we're unlikely to get caught, or value altruistic over selfish behavior. Wilson and a few others have tried manfully; but they still haven't gotten around the observation of Waisman, Schaechter, and Schlick (_Ethics and the Will_) to get from the empirical "is" to the ethical "ought". Yes, those Wiener Kreis gentlemen tried hard to ground everything in empirical and logical proof--and ended up crying like babies for a new "Scoratic Man" (after the guy who's only answer to the assertion that "the tyrant is the happiest of men" was to affirm a judgment after death) as the specter of the Anschluss loomed.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.