Submitted by John Philips(Japan), Apr 13, 2005 at 00:13
I'm still not convinced that this is a problem. I've seen professors try to shove their ideas down classes' throats, once from a conservative point of view, once from a liberal. Both times it backfired badly. Any professors who are trying to do that are making a big mistake.
The idea that there must be ideological balance in departments also assumes that ALL professors are going to try to shove their ideas down students' throats. In other words, it assumes that professors should not only be unprofessional, but stupid.
Trying to define "balance" would be nearly impossible, too. Just on the matter of Israel vs. the Palestinians, do you split 50-50 between those who support Israel and those who support the Palestinians, or do you give one third of the positions to those who support a two-state solution? How about a certain designated number of positions for Hamas, Gush Emunim etc. Do you change the proportions within the "pro-Israel" camp every time the Israelis have an election?
Multiply such problems by all the possible positions one could take on any conceivable issue, foreign or domestic, and you quickly realize that enforced "balance" of professors' opinions is not only unwise, it is impossible.
American universities are the best in the world. If they ain't broke, don't fix 'em.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.