69 million page views

Haji Syed: Grow up and smell the coffee

Reader comment on item: Niqabs and Burqas - The Veiled Threat Continues
in response to reader comment: Answer to dhimmi no more

Submitted by Plato (India), Nov 6, 2009 at 20:40

Haji Syed you wrote,

>>Again you are wrong, i think that you knows nothing about Islam, well let me explain you, Islam do not support weapons,…<<

Allah did tell Muslims that one Muslim is good enough to take on ten unbelievers, later he amended this special power of Muslims to just one of them to two infidels (8:65 – 66). This is the reason Muslims conquered Persia, the Byzantines, and enemy tribes using their bare hands while they fought uselessly with swords, spears, and catapults. LOL.

Now the verse below makes sense to me. The Muslims are told by Allah that using their muscle power and war horses they can strike terror into the hearts of non-Muslims armed to the teeth.

008.060 YUSUFALI: Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

But this verse from Surah Tauba does not make sense: 009.041 YUSUFALI: Go ye forth, (whether equipped) lightly or heavily, and strive and struggle, with your goods and your persons, in the cause of Allah. That is best for you, if ye (but) knew.

Was Allah asking Muslims to go to battle with scrawny light horses or fat heavy ones and cut down their enemies using karate chops?

>>… if so then every non-Muslim would have become Muslim forcely by weapons…<<

What makes you think that non-Muslims would not fight back when Allah's soldiers went to convert them? Remember the gates of Vienna where Muslim advace came to an abrupt stop? Also remember Charles Martel who routed the "weaponless" Muslim invaders at Tours and saved Europe. Muslim force was met with force.

>>… give me one proof about that the Islam has spread by weapons,…<<

As you are a Haji from India I suggest you read what gleeful Muslim historians have written about the bloodshed during the Muslim conquest of India. I give you one quote: "…when they arrived at their destination at early dawn they surrounded Khambyat and the idolators were awakened from their sleepy state of carelessness and were taken by surprise, not knowing where to go, and the mothers forgot their children and dropped them from their embrace. The Muhammadan forces began to 'kill and slaughter on the right and on the left unmercifully, throughout the impure land, for the sake of Islam,' and blood flowed in torrents. They plundered gold and silver to a greater extent than can be conceived…

They took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to 20,000, and children of both sexes, 'more than the pen can enumerate and thirteen enormous elephants whose motion would put the earth in tremor.' In short, the Muhammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, and destroyed the lives of the inhabitants, plundered the cities, and captured the offspring, so that many temples were deserted and the idols were broken and trodden underfoot, the largest was one called Somnat, fixed upon stone, polished like a mirror…." Page 43 Tazjiyatul Amsar Wa Tajriyatul Asar of Abdullah Wassaf, The History of India , as told by its own historians, Vol III, (translation by Sir H M Elliot and Prof John Dowson, Low Price Publications A-6 Nimri Commercial Centre, Near Ashok Nivas, Phase IV Delhi 110052).

The proof for bloody conquest and conversions is there for you to read in the history written by Muslim historians.

>>…if it would have been so then before Hazrat Ali ( Karam-Allah-Ta'ala-Wajaho ) would not have left any Non Mulims tn Jihad, he left all those Non Muslims and did not killed because he was knowing that in future in coming generation somebody will except Islam so he left many Non Muslims unkilled, if it was so then in Jihad Hazrat Ali would have killed all Non Muslims at that time, may be Hazrat Ali must have left your ancestors so that any body in your family could convert to Islam, and you are alive may be this is the gift of Hazrat Ali that he did not killed your ancestors before.<<

It was very generous of Ali to leave many infidels alive so that future generations of Muslim would have the opportunity to gain Allah's favour either by killing or converting them. The great Ali did set a great example for Mulims.

>>My dear Islam is clean of all bad thoughts and thinking, first you learn about Islam and then talk about it.<<

Here are some nice clean thoughts and thinking from Islam's holy books:

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 449: Narrated Al-Bara: The Prophet said to Hassan, "Abuse them (with your poems), and Gabriel is with you (i.e, supports you)." (Through another group of sub narrators) Al-Bara bin Azib said, "On the day of Quraiza's (besiege), Allah's Apostle said to Hassan bin Thabit, 'Abuse them (with your poems), and Gabriel is with you (i.e. supports you).

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 450: Narrated Abu Dhar: …..He said, "It was Gabriel who appeared to me beside Al-Harra and said, 'Give the good news to your followers that whoever dies without having worshipped anything besides Allah, will enter Paradise.' I said, 'O Gabriel! Even if he had committed theft or committed illegal sexual intercourse?' He said, 'Yes.'

And here is the clean Islam of your Hazrat Ali:

Volume 5, Book 59, Number 637: Narrated Buraida: The Prophet sent 'Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and 'Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, "Don't you see this (i.e. Ali)?" When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?" I said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus."

>>Hijab Niqab what you know about this, you and your family might be living nude in your house who Knows, atleast we know that our Muslims brother and Sisters are living with full colthes on.<<

How do you know? Have you been peeping into your Muslim neighbours' houses?

>> Modernisation do not means that only after you have sex or take off your clothes then only you will become educated, one can become educated with full clothes on,…<<

You are one confused Muslim. What has wearing clothes got to do with education? You are an Indian so you must have heard of Naga sadhus and Jain munis who go about stark naked and only an uneducated man will call them uneducated.

>>.. that is why all christian scientist wored full cloths and invented many usefull things that you are using in your daily life. If you become nude and then what you will invent condoms or sex toys may be. <<

Strange Muslim logic as usual. You are saying that being fully covered has something to do with one's scientific capabilities. Maybe you are right. Westerners live in the cold north and so have to cover themselves up pretty heavily. Muslims live in the tropics and are lightly clothed. The Christians have an edge over Muslims as they are better covered. You have discovered a great scientific fact that the better clothed you are the more scientific discoveries will come your way. But now that the West is moving towards nudism (having invented centrally heating) you can expect the Muslim world to do better in the sciences.

An interesting fact you should know: There are only about 15 million Jews in the world against 1500 million Muslims. The Jews have won more than a hundred Nobel Prizes. The number of Muslims who have won the Nobel you can count on the fingers of your hands. Are the Jews better covered up than the Muslims?



P.S. >>Plz GROW UP. <<

Muslims have grown in numbers but unfortunately have also dumbed down in the process.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)