69 million page views

Nisar, Bilal: As defenders of Islam you can you do better than refer me to Zakir Naik

Reader comment on item: Niqabs and Burqas - The Veiled Threat Continues
in response to reader comment: Plato ,Dhimmi Exposed

Submitted by Plato (India), Sep 20, 2009 at 03:46

Nisar, Bilal, (is this some kind of Indo-UK cooperation?) you write,

>>Hey,Plato and dhimmi,what is problem of you guys when i give you statistics about christian rape,and christian bible simply you guys says you dont follow old testament (which you should not follow also since your bible has 50000 errors ) every new year all vulgar authors compose the so called BIBLE , you say religion cannot be judged by rapes ,very true then why every time for every individual act you guys blame ISLAM ,<<

Just one comment. Check the Internet to read who spews more venom about other religions compared to anti-Islamic comments.

>>… you christian missionary have only one thing to some how twist the verses and put it according to your wishes,..<<

You are a devotee of Zakir Naik. But you have not been paying attention to his Peace TV. Once in a while he quotes a verse from the Koran to show what a sublime book it is. This is what he quotes: "If anyone who murders any person who had not committed murder or horrendous crimes, it shall be as if he murdered all the people. And anyone who spares a life, it shall be as if he spared the lives of all the people. Our messengers went to them with clear proofs and revelations, but most of them, after all this, are still transgressing" Surah 5, Verse No. 32. Now take out any Koran translation and read the full untruncated verse to see what the it really says.

>>.. if you want to have a dialogue and know more about islam then why dont you have a debate with zakir naik, ..<<

What credibility can you give to a man who deliberately misquotes the Koran?

>>…you know he has exposed many active working missionary so called pastors like,Henry ruknuddin and The great William Cambphell to such extent that at last cambphell was only saying that Zakir has put me into problem i dont know any thing but i have faith in jesus ,…<<

You don't know you have been had. Just like some Christian evangelists perfom stage manged miracles in the name of Jesus. There is no greater artful dodger on Islam than Zakir Naik.

Here is something I found about the Islamic wisdom of Zakir Naik at the IRF site:

Which revelation sent to India?

The question that arises is "which revelation of God has sent to India and whether we can consider the Vedas and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God?" There is no text in the Qur'an or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelation that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptures are no where to be found in Qur'an and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure that they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may not be the revelation of God. [IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT FROM SAYING, AS THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE KORAN OR HADITH IN THE VEDAS OR UPANISHADS THEREFORE ONE CANNOT SAY FOR SURE THEY WERE THE REVELATIONS OF BRAHMAN]

"Even if the Veda was the word of God today you have to follow the Qur'an
Even if the Vedas and the other scriptures were the revelations from God, they were only meant for people of that time and were to be followed only for that particular period of time. [WHY DID ALLAH WASTE HIS TIME AND ENERGY REVEALING SOMETHING HE KNEW WOULD BE IN THE TRASH CAN AFTER A FEW THOUSAND YEARS?]

"Today all human beings through out the world including India should only follow the last and final Revelation of God, i.e. the Qur'an." [BY WHOSE ORDERS, ZAKIR NAIK'S? OR BY THE PHANTOM GOD FOUND IN A BOOK WHICH ITSELF CLAIMS TO BE FROM THE SAME PHANTOM GOD –DO YOU SEE CIRCULARITY HERE?]

"Moreover since all the previous revelations were not meant to be followed for eternity, Almighty God did not preserve them in their original form." [DID NOT PRESERVE OR COULD NOT PRESERVE? WHO WOULD WANT TO BELIEVE IN A GOD WHO CANNOT GET HIS MESSAGE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME? WAS ALLAH NOT CAPABLE OF PRESERVING HIS MESSAGE IN THE ORIGINAL FORM UNTIL MUHAMMAD'S TIME? ]

"There is not a single religious scripture of any of the major religions which claims to be the word of God and has maintained its pure original text and is free from alteration, adulteration and interpolation. [IF I WRITE A SCRIPTURE NOW AND CLAIM IT IS THE LATEST WORD OF ALLAH, THE KORAN HAVING BEEN ABROGATED (remember 002.106 YUSUFALI: None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things.)WHAT WILL ZAKIR NAIK SAY? REMEMBER ALLAH HAS RESERVED THE POWER TO ABROGATE WHAT HE WANTS. AND WITH MODERN TECHNOLOGY NOT A DOT OF MY BOOK WILL CHANGE OVER THE LIFE OF THE EARTH]




Zakir Naik: "Even in the Rigveda which is the most sacred scripture of the Hindus, one of the attributes given to God Almighty in Book no 2 Hymn no I verse II, is 'Ila' which if pronounced properly is the same as Allah."

This is the hymn found on the Internet. Where is 'ila'? And is Zakir Naik a scholar of Sanskrit phonetics to proclaim that ila is pronounced Allah? He could at least have referred us to a Sanskrit scholar for this.

HYMN II. Agni.

1. WITH sacrifice exalt Agni who knows all life; worship him with oblation and the song of praise,
Well kindled, nobly fed; heaven's Lord, Celestial Priest, who labours at the pole where deeds of might are done.

yajñena vardhata jātavedasamaghniṃ yajadhvaṃ haviṣā tanā ghirā |

samidhānaṃ suprayasaṃ svarṇaraṃ dyukṣaṃ hotāraṃvṛjaneṣu dhūrṣadam ||


Another FAQ which he seems to have removed from the site was one in which he said that questioning the fact that Allah says He created the universe in six days in some verses and in eight days in another is blasphemy. Zakir Naik is a fake Islamic intellectual.

>>…try reading some Books The 100 most influential person in the world<<

If you have read this book you will find Muhammad in the company of people like Hitler, Genghiz Khan, Mao, Machiavelli. And best of all in this list Muhammad has the company of Queen Isabella I. Remember what she did to Muslims in Spain?

The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History is a 1978 book by Michael H. Hart. It is a ranking of the 100 people who most influenced human history. Since publication, the book has been hotly debated and its concept widely copied.

The book was reprinted in 1992 with several notable revisions made to the original list of 100 people and their associated rankings. Chief among these revisions was the demotion of figures associated with Communism, such as Vladimir Lenin and Mao Zedong, and the introduction of Mikhail Gorbache….. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_100

What guarantee is there Muhammad could NOT be broken back to the rear in future by someone else? Or what if a book about which person caused the most killings is written? I am willing to bet Muhammad would be among the honoured first three.

The book you are referring to is a personal evaluation of the author, based on some criteria he used. It is talking about INFLUENCE. Muhammad was the most influential man by the criteria he used. But it does not make the religion he founded the only true one. Or the person who founded the religion a holy person. For that you have to set up a different set of criteria. You will be forced to compare Muhammad with Gautam Buddha, Jesus Christ, Bahaullah, … If you are not squeamish about probing Muhammad's personal life and actions I suggest you read his biography from the original Muslims sources.

>>…if you present me those books which Cult christian like you have wriitten against ISLAM then i can show you 10 times more those books which christians have written Praising ISLAM so be open mind come for debate we will show u what is bible and what is quran ..<<

Why are they Christians still? They are probably writing them to earn some easy petro-dollars. Like Maurice Bucaille. Check whether Bucaille ever became a Mulim. LOL

>>Every time I am seeing you are only saying the same verse and twisting it presenting it in different context ,…<<

Give me one verse I have twisted or taken out of context and give me the correct meaning and context if you know what they are. You have only made an accusation without justifying yourself.

>>…does not matter people like you have come and gone nothing happend to islam still people from ur own idelogy are coming into fold of ISLAM kicking christianity the way you guys kicked 50000 verses from bible , the more u guys talks against islam the more people will come into folds of ISLAM and your so called JEHOVAH' (christian god) will only be hanging itself to cross… <<

All religions will perish, including Islam. You or I will not be there at the end. And Allah knows best.

>>…any way iam not expert on all this so please put your self on Zakir Naik website he will put u in right perspective now dont say u know every thing and dont want any thing ,u say ur from india then come have face to face talk dialogue…<<

You do not need to be an expert to understand Islam and least of all that of an 'expert' like Zakir Naik. His expertise consists of hoodwinking people like you. I showed you above the dishonest way he presents a Koranic verse. Read these verses in which Allah Himself tells you that the Koran is an easy book to understand:

054.017 YUSUFALI: And We have indeed made the Qur'an easy to understand and remember: then is there any that will receive admonition?

054.022 YUSUFALI: But We have indeed made the Qur'an easy to understand and remember: then is there any that will receive admonition?

054.032 YUSUFALI: And We have indeed made the Qur'an easy to understand and remember: then is there any that will receive admonition?

54:40 YUSUFALI: And We have indeed made the Qur'an easy to understand and remember: then is there any that will receive admonition?

Have you received the necessary admonition now?? Running to an expert to understand Allah is practically blasphemy according to Allah.

>> i have seen one thing all missionary guys puts up only same thing again and again twisting it against ISLAM why not ur so called JEHOVAH was tempted by satan when he came on earth looking at naked women ,BULLSHIT u see god came on earth getting tempted seeeing naked women ALL bullshit in corrupt BIBLE is written now dont tell god has overcome all this u r belief is also like Hindus Brahma having 10 hands god coming to earth marrying and enjoying any way please log on to IREF.NET this web will help you more in clearing your cobwebs.<<

Jehovah only looked at naked women. You know why Allah revealed these verses below. If you do not know, consult Zakir Naik:

033.051 YUSUFALI: Thou mayest defer (the turn of) any of them that thou pleasest, and thou mayest receive any thou pleasest: and there is no blame on thee if thou invite one whose (turn) thou hadst set aside. This were nigher to the cooling of their eyes, the prevention of their grief, and their satisfaction - that of all of them - with that which thou hast to give them: and Allah knows (all) that is in your hearts: and Allah is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing.

Narrated Aisha: I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily)." (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:311, See Also Sahih Muslim 8:3453

033.037 Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah's command must be fulfilled.

066.003 YUSUFALI: When the Prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his consorts, and she then divulged it (to another), and Allah made it known to him, he confirmed part thereof and repudiated a part. Then when he told her thereof, she said, "Who told thee this? "He said, "He told me Who knows and is well-acquainted (with all things)."

>>Enjoy reading dont feel jealous about islam since more and more people coming into folds of islam<<

Jealous of Islam? A religion founded by a Prophet whose loose morals are mandated by Allah as you saw above. I am jealous only because Allah has accorded only Muhammad total freedom with the ladies!




Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)