2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

More Answers-To Dhimmi

Reader comment on item: How the West Could Lose
in response to reader comment: For our dear M&M and his bogus command of Islamic theology

Submitted by moderate Muslim (United States), Mar 10, 2007 at 13:20

OK

so dhimmi used al-baqarah 216 and at-tawbah 4 as his evidence.

Al Baqarah 216: It merely says this, that fighting is prescribed for you and it is wrong to hide away from the battle instead of fighting in the name of Allah. It does not talk about attacking, it is merely to denounce cowardice, this is the way scholars see it.

Also, it condemns careless violence, like terrorism, if you are a brawler or an agressiv eperson this is selfishness and deserves the highest censure." So this works in the favor of Islam. Punk. I dont think you can read Arabic.

At-Tawbah 4: Well, I'm pretty sure what you are talking about is At-Tauba 5, not 4, because 4 tells the Muslims to honor the treaties with the Pagans in the highest regard. It then says in At-Tauba 5, that once the treaty has expired, if they show no signs of desisting from their aggressive manner, than a stage of war can begin, again, within the narrow parameters of war in Islam. Also, this not to be apllied in a modern concept as much as the historical concept. This was revealed when the Treaty of Hudaybiah was signed and the Meccans and the Muslims brokered a peace. Allah made it clear that this was not surrender, but merely a truce, and later sure enough the Meccans broke the deal and attacked the Muslims with no provocation. And when the Muslims beat back the Pagans, they entered Mecca in peace, with no battle, and gave sanctuary to all those who did not fight back. The people of Mecca, who persecuted the Prophet and his people, were not harmed.

So much for Muslim violence.

Thank you for proving my point.

See how logic works.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to More Answers-To Dhimmi by moderate Muslim

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)