69 million page views

That's not a valid response

Reader comment on item: Why I Stand with Geert Wilders
in response to reader comment: not a case yet of "eff off - we're full'.

Submitted by Anonymous (United States), Jan 25, 2010 at 06:42

"My answer to that would be 'very possibly'. If you've ever been to Holland - you'll realise what a small country it is. There's not a great deal of room for the Dutch to expand into - let alone anyone else."

That logic doesnt hold to me. In that case he should be calling for a halt to immigration from all countries which is not what Wilders is saying. Having no room to expand to and stopping ALL immigration is different (and understandable) from singling out people like Wilders is doing. I understand Wilders' stand against people from Islamic countries but not this bizarre rule to lump everybody he wants to keep out with muslims. Under his rule, it seems he would be ok with a British or American muslim migrating to Holland but not a Japanese or Indian non-muslim. I am sorry but I see nothing here but a thinly veiled racism against dark skinned people whatever their religion may be.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)