69 million page views

Our dear Asma and the bogus hadith

Reader comment on item: Salman Rushdie and British Backbone
in response to reader comment: Reply

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 21, 2008 at 06:55

Our dear Asma wrote

>First of all Goldziher didn't prove anything.

That the hadith is not anachronistic? Are you for real? And do you know what is really anachronistic literature? and why do we have isnads darling? Hint: early on it was clear to those that collected the bogus hadith that there was so much fraud going on. And why do we have hadith sahih wa hadith da3eef darling? Hint: the hadith was bogus

>It was his point of view and he was more an orientalist than a historian.

Then propve him wrong darling. Hint: that the hadith is not really anachronistic and you are ignorant

>Do you know?

Know what darling? That you are ignorant? I know this already. Or that you no more than a demagogue? I already know that too.

>"Goldziher regarded Judaism and Islam as kindred faiths."

So? Hint: Islam is a by-product of the Judeo-Christian tradition darling

> In Cairo Goldziher even prayed as a Muslim:

So? What does that prove? Let me help you: nothing not a thing about what he did prove and that is the hadith is bogus and anachronistic

>"In the midst of the thousands of the pious, I rubbed my forehead against the floor of the mosque. Never in my life was I more devout, more truly devout, than on that exalted Friday.

And what does that prove? Nothing not a thing

>I don't regard Patricia Crone a reliable source.

And who cares if you regard anyone as reliable source or not. And do you know why? Because you are ignorant

The fundamental Islamic sources such as the

Snip drivel. You know Crone's little final nail in the coffin of the hadith is really mighty


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)