69 million page views

I cannot speak for anyone else but myself

Reader comment on item: Salman Rushdie and British Backbone
in response to reader comment: To Plato: Write me which source or sources you believe in?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 21, 2007 at 21:23

I think that the hadith is bogus and so is the sira and so is tarikh and so is asbab al-nuzul. Did I forget anything? Oh yeah and the Qur'an that opaque revelation is a poorly written and edited book that is confusing and just plain confused book and without the bogus hadith and the bogus sira and the bogus asbab al-nuzul it just does not make any sense.

And like i say: you ain't no Arab and Islam is the religion of the Arabs so who is really your rasul because he ain't Abul Qasim?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)