69 million page views

dhimmi you are on point

Reader comment on item: Salman Rushdie and British Backbone
in response to reader comment: Simon: well said

Submitted by Simon (United States), Jul 11, 2007 at 11:10

Hello dhimmi

You are absolutely correct. I have the Bible in "the original Syriac/Aramaic"( I am Syriac/ Suryoyo) the one Muslims claim is the real deal.

Does that mean I have the original because its in Aramaic?

Did Mo have the original when he confirmed the Bible a dozen or so times?

If so why didn't Mo or his companions protect the original Bible when he was using it to confirm it and plagiarized it?

Maybe he never read it (recited since he could not read)or really never knew what was said it.

Maybe Syed well tell us something we didn't know?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)