69 million page views

The Quranic anfasakum

Reader comment on item: Salman Rushdie and British Backbone
in response to reader comment: dhimmi please one more time

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 23, 2007 at 18:03

This is how the word is written in the Qur'an 4:34

1. laif madda or A

2. nuun with a sukun or n.

3. feh with a damma or f

4. seen with a fatha or sa

5. kaf with a damma or ku

6. meem with a sukun and it would be m

So the word is voclaized as: anfasakum (see Ruthevn) and even if you read it as anfasukum it would not change the meaning

I do not think he is an Arab. Pakistanis confuse the words roh and nafs and they have no clue which is which. Any Arabic speaker would agree with Pickthall's transaltion that the word here means: One another aka yourselves.

the long alif can be missing in the Quranic rasm (and for this see example below) and is he aawre that the original Quranic rasm did not have short vowels and it has many missing long vowels? and it was all edited by the 3Ulama. Ask him: How come he did not know that?

Now if you have Pickthall's translation you will find that the word MLK (this is the rasm) in Surat al-Fatiha is written as

1 M from the rasm

2. then we have an added alif after the meem which is the editing by the 3Ulama or aa

3. Lam from the rasm

4. then we have a kasra added by the 3ulama or i

5. Kaf from the rasm

6. then we have an added kasra or i

and now we have the word MaaLiKi

Another example of a word that lacks an alif but it is added by the 3Ulama above the rasm is al-BYNT or al- Bayanaat and for this you can check Pickthall's translation page 40 Q2:253

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The Quranic anfasakum by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)