1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

And speaking of more filth: Smare says that the Qur'an says that Allah is really he who decieves

Reader comment on item: Obama Would Fail Security Clearance
in response to reader comment: Why Not?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 29, 2008 at 08:17

Mor bogus Arabic from samer

>Why Not?

Why not what? ... You keep on quoting Lane bot you never provide us with a page number and you think that I did not notice? Arabs and those that know Arabic woudl quote Liasn al-3araba or any good Arabic language qamoos

And why did you tell us that the Qur'an says al-adna when it was only adna?

>Adna - lowest and al-adna the nearest

the word adna means near and al-adna means the near as in al-sharq al-adna or the near east and not rhe nearest and the word nearest means al-aqrab and the word low means munkhafid and shame on you for not knowing so

>The word bitaanah means the lining of your coat - WRONG it means both Hashiya, (entourage and lining)

Then it means the lining of your little coat. Right? Then you are wrong because you seemed to have no clue that it means the lining of your little coat

>The word makkar means he who deceives., God is best deceiver in good why , Dhimmi is best deceiver in bad way

Then makkar means he who decieves and you are not really a makkar because this will give you some credit as you are really ignorant

>The word dahaahaa means he made it flat - Wrong - it means like an ostrich egg

If you say so then you do not know any Arabic and you cannot be an Arab as the word dahaahaa means he made it flat and it has nothing to do with baydat al-na3ama mr ignorant and shame on you for saying so

>I have my own sources but I also give reference,

Then provide us with the page number and the name of your source so saying that we can find it in Lane is not enough

> if you can' tfind it, it is your problem, do you want me to feed you with a spoon

No I cannot find it because it is not there and you are making things up and I challange you to prove me wrong

>You quote the Bible to prove a point and no real Arab would do such a thing - Why Not?

The Bible is a corrupted (sic) book. Right? Then any information that you can obtain from the Bible to prove a point is corrupted (sic). Right? Then your point becomes no point. Right? Which means: garbage in is garbage out

If you do not get this much then you must get your money back from your glorious madrassa

>But I know who you are

And I know very well who you are ...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to And speaking of more filth: Smare says that the Qur'an says that Allah is really he who decieves by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)