2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Teaching one tablighee at a time

Reader comment on item: Obama Would Fail Security Clearance
in response to reader comment: Why Not?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 30, 2008 at 12:12

Our dear samer wrote

>You quote the Bible to prove a point and no real Arab would do such a thing - Why Not?

OK let me give you an example:

1. Muslims tell us, including you, that Muhammad is the comforter mentioned in the corrupted (sic) Bible. Right?

2. Well the Bible is corrupted (sic) Right?

3. Then this little gem about the comforter must be corrupted too. Right?

4. Then you cannot tell us that the comfoter in the corrupted (sic) Bible is Muhammad because the Bible is corrupted (sic)! If you do not get this much then you are really beyond help

5. And here is your first bonus for today: Abul Qasim (this is his kunya) aka Qutham (and this is his name) the so called Arabian prophet. Now our dear Quthan (kunya abul qasim) hears that there is something in the Bible called the comforter and he decided to chage his name to Muhammad aka Ahmad and this will be a case or reversing cause for effect. Right?You did not get this one did you?

6. Even if the Bible is not really corrupted then how can you be sure that Muhammad aka Ahmad aka Qutham aka Abul Qasim is really the comforter of the Bible? Let me help you: you cannot.

7. Another bonus for today: I'm Dhimmi no more and I just changed my name to Muhammad and my friends can call me Ahmad. You think that I'm the comforter in the Bible and I'm not even an Arabian warlord or caravan raider?

8. Oh there is one more bonus: the author or the Arabian book of ignorance tells us in Q7:157-158 that Muslims will find Muhammad's name in the Bible. Right? Well the Bible is corrupted! Do you see how poor is the logic of the author of the Qur'an? It is either corrupted and in this case it is unreliable as a literary source that you can use to prove a point or it is not corrupted and in this case we can believe that the Bible is talking about the so called prophet and in this case the Bible is not corrupted. So which one is it ?

This is why you cannot quote the Bible and if you do not get this much then you are beyond help which you are

The Muslim Arabs? They do not quote the Bible to prove a point because they know better than you and your poor madrassa education and your silly pre-occupation with silly Muslim polemics

I urge you to abandon islam

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Teaching one tablighee at a time by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)