3 readers online now  |  69 million page views
You're invited: Join Daniel Pipes & MEF on a fact-finding mission
to Poland, Hungary & Austria. For more information, click here

Redeploy specifically or primarily to KURDISTAN

Reader comment on item: Salvaging the Iraq War

Submitted by Ron Thompson (United States), Jul 24, 2007 at 21:13

There are a number of reasons that a redeployment of most of our troops to Kurdistan would arrest the accelerating hemorrhage of our position in Iraq, and at the same time enable the US to salvage and even advance our strategic interests in the Middle East. In other words, a decision to make this redeployment would refute the widespread and bleak assessment that "all our options in Iraq are bad".

1. This redeployment would almost completely end the loss of life and sustaining of terrible wounds by our soldiers, which are increasingly and rightly seen as a pointless and unforgivable waste. This would happen because Kurdistan is an ally of necessity and, by all the accounts I've seen, strongly desires our presence and protection from an unbroken circle of neighbors who wish to annihilate it (sound familiar with regard to our only true ally in the region?).

2. This redeployment would put us in a far better position to monitor and if need be menace an Iran which has become dangerously grandiose in its ambitions. Not only would we be even closer to Iran, but we would be surrounded by a friendly population and army rather than being distracted and hamstrung by the savage and deadly enmity of both Shiites and Sunnis in the rest of a crumbling Iraq.

3. Ditto with regard to Syria.

4. This redeployment would send a 'signal' to Turkey not to invade and snuff out Kurdistan. This is more important than it sounds because Bush, after having trashed every valuable lesson of his father's war is now on the road to repeat his only grave mistake - the betrayal of the Kurds in 1991. If this betrayal happens a second time, it will be a more dangerous evidence of our inconstancy as a reliable international ally than the failure to prop up the corrupt, incompetent, and viciously sectarian Maliki "government".

5. This redeployment would be invaluable in helping us regain the political initiative. From being on the defensive, from being unable to protect our soldiers from militarily useless loss of life and limb, and from continuing to show a disapproving world an utter absence of achievable policy goals in Iraq, we would have made a bold change that quickly stemmed or even stopped the loss of US lives, and
put us in a dramatic position to reproject power from the heart of the Middle East. We would have regained our freedom of movement and maneuver, both politically and militarily.

Incidentally, then and not now, from a position of renewed strength rather than great stress and perceived weakness, would be the time to start talks with Iran and Syria.

6. Related to the above, this strategic redeployment would give us a strong and secure base from which to send Special and other forces to attack, assault and annihilate any Taliban- or Hezbollah-like force that tried to establish itself anywhere in the remnants of Shiite or Sunni Iraq. This would not be a complete answer to all the problems the crumbled remnants of Iraq would present to its various neighbors,
but it is an answer to any major threat Jihadists in Iraq might present to the United States, or to Israel.

Neither Iraq's geography nor any bordering areas lend themselves to the sanctuary threat that we face along the Pakistan/ Afghanistan border. It also bears remembering, as a redeployment to Kurdistan gave us relief from guerilla warfare, that none of Iraq's neighbors have been particularly helpful, and that Iraqis could have chosen a political and peaceful opposition to our presence rather than instantly opting for beheadings and other savagery. In other words, although our reckless leaders provoked this mess, we are not responsible for the escalating lethal activities taking place - the Iraqis and the Shiite and Sunni cultures, and, dare one say it, the religion of Islam and homicidal clerics are
responsible if genocide or something close to it takes place in Iraq.

And if a wider regional war is going to take place, we do not have the primary responsibility for that. The participants in such a war will have that honor.

7. Last, and not least, the decision to redeploy, assuming the attitude of the Kurdish government and people remains as pro-American as it seems to be, depends on no one else. This means that the awful position we let ourselves get into - a position that no Great Power versed in the fundamentals of statecraft should ever allow to happen - with our success and prestige dependent on a reed as incompetent and unreliable as the Maliki "government", is entirely cured.

It seems inconceivable that Bush will willingly accept any redeployment. The reason is simple. To accept it means recognition, at least to some degree, that his policy and war in Iraq has been a terrible failure. But the irony, and grave danger to the national interest is, if we don't have a policy that intelligently tries to salvage and renew our position, we stand to sustain a wholy unrelieved and strategic defeat and loss of all Iraq to enemy and probably terrorist forces.

We must not blindly, mulishly, and above all unimaginatively, pursue a policy of 'surge' and 'escalation' that has no more behind it than the President's plaintive plea to "give it a chance". His misguided supporters, otherwise responsible figures such as McCain, Graham, and Lieberman, should do much better than this I think MacArthur, of Inchon fame, might like this idea.

If we react boldly, and redeploy decisively and imaginatively, we might well save far more of our position in the Middle East than anyone thinks
possible now. But Bush is incapable of doing it on his own, or even of accepting it. It must be urged and even politically forced on him by
the bolder spirits in Congress. Let us hope, as they have begun to, that they can rise to this challenge, and show a better, wiser, and
more intelligently ferocious United States than has been seen since the decision was made to stop pursuing bin Laden and take the wrong
turn into Iraq.

Ron Thompson


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (108) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
My Opinion [247 words]TabarkMar 31, 2010 13:00170825
Iraq War. [81 words]Holly HMar 24, 2009 15:33152703
I think an internal redeployment in Iraq is a good but inadequate step [218 words]Charles MartelAug 27, 2007 18:06107073
Criminal Incompetence [132 words]Jean de la ValletteAug 29, 2007 13:36107073
ingredient for lasting peace in Iraq [225 words]jennifer solisAug 22, 2007 14:58106772
Reply to Ms. Solis' comments [304 words]Roger W. GardnerAug 22, 2007 21:34106772
knowledge vs. opinion [486 words]jennifer SolisAug 23, 2007 18:54106772
Response to Ms. Solis' comments [300 words]Roger W. GardnerAug 24, 2007 17:31106772
unconditional surrender [226 words]jennifer solisAug 24, 2007 18:53106772
Reply to Ms. Solis' comments [497 words]Roger W. GardnerAug 26, 2007 18:48106772
the pleasure is mine [102 words]jennifer solisAug 28, 2007 15:28106772
Bush won all the battles, and lost the war. [181 words]SheerahkahnAug 15, 2007 15:47106294
Re: Salvaging the Iraqi War [45 words]Paul B. RossAug 8, 2007 09:11105686
Iraq's not ready for national democracy, but local control and democracy is possible [214 words]JabbaTheTuttAug 6, 2007 08:41105558
Daniel Pipes for President! [199 words]Archimedes2Aug 2, 2007 00:20105260
Plans evolve from great minds like D.P. [182 words]infosifterJul 31, 2007 23:18105204
You fight to win not appease [413 words]guy leven-torres (agricola)Aug 3, 2007 17:59105204
Iraq: Pandora's box or Pyrrhic Victory? [574 words]Guy Leven-TorresJul 31, 2007 10:42105173
Re-Deploy Troops to Iraq Borders [151 words]RobJul 31, 2007 06:35105160
Iraq and what to do about it [394 words]AyashaJul 30, 2007 15:12105139
The Battle of Iraq and the Clash of Civilizations [359 words]Roger W. GardnerJul 29, 2007 16:31105083
The Battle of Iraq and the Clash of Civilizations - Correct [143 words]J SharpeJul 29, 2007 21:15105083
Gardner's comments [52 words]Gale ShawJul 30, 2007 15:11105083
Can Islam [215 words]donvanAug 1, 2007 15:10105083
Clash of Civilizations: A self-fulfilling Prophecy [287 words]JeeshanAug 2, 2007 04:26105083
Silence of Moderate Muslims is Losing its Appeal [158 words]SSAug 6, 2007 02:09105083
Dangerous Minds [306 words]JeeshanAug 13, 2007 11:34105083
Response to SS: "Silence of the moderate Muslims..." [264 words]Roger W. GardnerAug 19, 2007 23:01105083
RE: Salvaging the Iraq War [22 words]Len PeracchioAug 31, 2007 13:42105083
US-Led Forces Out Of The Region [238 words]Jahanshah RashidianJul 29, 2007 03:58105057
Circumstance Lost: Preparing for the Alternatives [859 words]M. ToveyJul 31, 2007 12:29105057
short term vs long term [92 words]AndrewJul 28, 2007 17:54105046
Re: "Salvaging the Iraq War" [163 words]BradJul 28, 2007 15:35105040
The Arab Mind and Culture [322 words]James FittzJul 28, 2007 14:04105036
Who is Fawas A. Gerges? [141 words]JabbaTheTuttAug 6, 2007 08:55105036
Oh, God, When Will It End? [211 words]MonkJul 26, 2007 20:35104929
back up... [35 words]donvanAug 2, 2007 10:17104929
Still no easy task [153 words]Omar MahmoudJul 26, 2007 14:23104872
I'm not sure this would work [47 words]EagleJimJul 26, 2007 13:52104871
US failure based on denial of Iraq's sectarian facts on the ground [370 words]Michael GreenJul 26, 2007 11:54104861
Seek support for this [189 words]BosJul 26, 2007 07:23104850
One hand tied between our backs [145 words]David W. LincolnJul 25, 2007 15:26104763
A creative new solution to solve the Iraq problem. [127 words]Haim BelisowskiJul 25, 2007 14:10104750
What a Mess! [140 words]BlackspeareJul 25, 2007 13:47104748
pre-arab mesopotamia [47 words]G.VishvasJul 26, 2007 06:37104748
Reply to Blackspeare- One problem [876 words]Chris G.Jul 26, 2007 11:32104748
Reply to Chris G. [122 words]BlackspeareJul 27, 2007 12:25104748
Divide Iraq along traditional ethnic and religious lines! US and allies should referee process. [371 words]William BryanJul 25, 2007 13:32104746
Is it really that simple? [308 words]PatJul 25, 2007 19:55104746
Is it really that simple? Ans: Yes! [489 words]William BryanJul 27, 2007 13:17104746
William: Well Excuse ME [124 words]PatJul 27, 2007 21:30104746
A figure of speech but... [78 words]GanJul 25, 2007 09:01104716
A Workable Strategy? [64 words]LDCJul 25, 2007 08:18104710
Salvaging the war not the final solution [296 words]PlatoJul 25, 2007 06:49104697
Pato- good but not excellent analysis. [216 words]Mary BushongJul 25, 2007 22:28104697
Redeploy specifically or primarily to KURDISTAN [1011 words]Ron ThompsonJul 24, 2007 21:13104666
More reasns to redeploy specifically or primarily to KURDISTAN [259 words]Frans GroenendijkJul 25, 2007 20:11104666
Kurdistan as a stronghold [179 words]Marc JorisJul 27, 2007 04:19104666
Kudos! [10 words]Seth GinsburgJul 24, 2007 20:23104661
Iraq war compromise--still possible success [54 words]Morton ReitmanJul 24, 2007 19:57104659
I Agree [57 words]John RJul 24, 2007 19:51104657
The Iraq War Article [479 words]Eleanor GoldsteinJul 24, 2007 18:56104650
Salvaging the Iraq War [281 words]Philip SnyderJul 24, 2007 22:50104650
crystal clarity [29 words]david eisenbergJul 24, 2007 18:51104649
Now this is... [12 words]LDCJul 25, 2007 08:20104649
Like the Board Game Risk [194 words]SSJul 24, 2007 18:29104625
Building houses on a swamp [160 words]DimitriJul 24, 2007 17:06104621
Not only sand... [36 words]GodotJul 25, 2007 11:31104621
oil and strategy [145 words]DimitriJul 25, 2007 16:11104621
Anything [15 words]AlfoJun 24, 2013 22:32104621
Military Strength Requires Political Resolve - From ALL [939 words]M. ToveyJul 24, 2007 16:38104618
good suggestion [32 words]DarrenJul 24, 2007 16:20104617
Iraq's problem is really an internal Islamic Conflict [183 words]David GoshenJul 24, 2007 16:02104613
Strongly Disagree on Iraqi Reluctance to Jointly See the War Through to Victory [124 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Nancy BeutelJul 24, 2007 15:36104606
What does "Victory" mean in Iraq? [289 words]Charles MartelAug 29, 2007 11:27104606
Time to Change America's Paper Tiger Foreign/Military Policy [178 words]Ron KurtzJul 24, 2007 15:12104601
The coalition gave Iraqis a fresh start. Now it's their turn. [527 words]PatJul 24, 2007 14:15104596
Staying Put [192 words]Rebecca MouldsJul 24, 2007 13:46104592
article [74 words]SteveJul 24, 2007 13:31104591
After redeployment, what? [98 words]Robert CohanJul 24, 2007 13:21104590
pull the plug. [87 words]donvanJul 24, 2007 15:45104590
Iraqis must be responsbile [93 words]Coyote UglyJul 24, 2007 13:14104589
Pakistan should have been the target and not Iraq [280 words]dhimmi no moreJul 24, 2007 13:09104588
About statesmanship [99 words]G.VishvasJul 25, 2007 12:56104588
President Bush is "visionary" and Wisonian [179 words]Steve KleinJul 24, 2007 13:06104587
to Steve Klein - on the money [439 words]rickJul 24, 2007 15:58104587
I don't remember that Pipes article, but good on him! [87 words]Charles MartelAug 27, 2007 18:11104587
More than just semantics [190 words]GodotJul 24, 2007 13:04104586
Salvaging the Iraq war [92 words]Colonel B.J,. FinestoneJul 24, 2007 12:55104585
Iraq [66 words]Ron RotemJul 24, 2007 12:54104584
Destination Iraq [73 words]RobertJul 24, 2007 12:49104583
How to save Iraq [275 words]RickJul 24, 2007 12:31104581
coming from someone who's been there four times.... [202 words]ahmazafireJul 28, 2007 15:18104581
to ahmazafire [458 words]RickJul 30, 2007 14:49104581
The futility of peacemaking and democratization in the Middle East [234 words]Kenneth S. BesigJul 24, 2007 11:53104578
There are no Palestinians [258 words]yuval brandstetter MDJul 27, 2007 04:30104578
But then what? [51 words]John LothJul 24, 2007 11:49104577
diminished vision [74 words]Leo SolomonJul 24, 2007 11:41104576
Build a fence [88 words]LindaKJul 24, 2007 11:21104575
A fence is not a solution...at least for Iraq [30 words]GodotJul 24, 2007 16:08104575
No fence? [106 words]LindaKJul 24, 2007 19:29104575
There are known unknowns and ...(without permission from D. Rumsfield) [87 words]GodotJul 25, 2007 14:04104575
There are known unknowns and ...(without permission from D. Rumsfield) [140 words]LindaKJul 25, 2007 14:47104575
US should redeploy its troops at ..... [89 words]DaraJul 24, 2007 11:14104574
If we follow your recommendation, what happens if the Iraq erupts into civil war? [58 words]Robert ArbetmanJul 24, 2007 10:46104571
The American [138 words]donvanJul 26, 2007 12:50104571
What about The American? [285 words]PatJul 27, 2007 15:54104571
Novis Ordo.. [213 words]DONVANJul 31, 2007 09:04104571

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Redeploy specifically or primarily to KURDISTAN by Ron Thompson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)