69 million page views

Exposing ignorance and you need to stick to Urdu our dear Amin!

Reader comment on item: Arabist Snobs
in response to reader comment: Lets sit down and analyse these "dictionaries" and try not to laugh at this mess

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 11, 2015 at 17:40

Our dear Jamil whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Islam and who lives among kuffar and not among his Wahhabi masters and why is that? It must be the social benefits

You still did not answer so let me ask you again

I wrote: Fadiha Kabira and this was and you must pardon me your stupid answer:

this nonsense was meant to be فضيح كبير - big disgrace - you could not even get the word for big/great - right - and this is pure bas

You wrote Fadih Kabir! Right? Sir you do not know any Arabic! I rest my case

Oh here is the link


Anyone who does not know that Fadiha is feminine is not an Arab

Care to comment our dear Jamil?

Oh can you also tell us readers did you check with the editors of the Grand Poobah I mean "The Grand Gramamrian" (which is a stupid remark) Hans Wehr's dictionary? Let me guess you did not oh the reason? Because you are realizing that you are making a fool of yourself right?

So tell us:

1. What is meant by the word receipt in the case of the word Istilam?

Hint: never use the definition of an Arabic word by looking up the definition of the word in an English language dictionary as you did before remember?

2. What is really a receipt to an Arab? Hint: It is a contract on a piece of paper between two parties that allows RECEIVING (as in Wasl al-Istilam) or some srevice and it is called a receipt and your Arab masters call it Isal or Wasl and they do not call the document Istilam do you get it or are you that slow?

3. Why did you not tell the readers that Istilam has other definitions 3 more to be exact? Why the lies?

I have no respect for you

Oh and here is your bonus: How come your Allah is silent about your Hindu ancestors? Any guesses?

Oh there will be more about your very poor Arabic as in the case of Ibn Naghl (sic) remember? and by the way you are neither fuuny nor original

Now it is your turn to make a fool of yourself! Go!


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)