69 million page views

Property Laws INVENTION making spoliation legal

Reader comment on item: Not Stealing Palestine but Purchasing Israel

Submitted by Blues Driver (Canada), Feb 7, 2014 at 20:50

What about "Present Absentee" ?
And even absentees as in Israel Property Law ...

What about the fallacious Supreme court Ruling that Building A Settlement COULD be interpreted as " a security" reason since it is easier for IDF to patrol a settlement than a Palestinian village or city ...

This in contradiction with the UN and The Hague International Court that maintain the WORD CONSENSUS denied only by Israel that the "Occupied Territories" CANNOT BE BUILD BY AGGRESSOR FORCE UNLESS it is to benefit locals and Indigenous people !!! NO CIVILIAN DISPLACEMENT is allowed !!! Under the 4th Geneva Convention ...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)