2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

the conspiracy is wrong

Reader comment on item: Is Prince Charles a Convert to Islam?

Submitted by 1947 (Canada), Dec 25, 2019 at 17:45

from the evidence given above, and the associated articles surrounding diana's death, he didn't do it.

what begs the question however, especially after her death was changed to an "unlawful killing" is "who" and "why?".

the note diana wrote forecasting her own death (admittedly four years prior) is chilling, but the history of the topical matter on this page begins right around her death.

it was rumoured that al fayed was to propose to her that day (which people close to the matter said she would have rejected), and the theories (on both his religion and his involvement) really swirled after the accident resulting in their death.

i suspect the same individuals charles is praising are those who wanted the death of diana for the rejection they knew was to come. she (diana) stated visiting the Muslim structure in india (taj mahal) was a "healing experience".

it seems charles is hamstrung by a well-known adversary, where his materialistic appetites have lead to the sycophancy we are witnessing above, all abetted by Rothschild (who he recently just gave an interfaith award to).

our well-known adversary must be given credit, as i stupidly believed for a while that he was the one who truly wanted diana dead. but now, it seems this was all what one could only call "masterful planning" by our well-known adversary. without them, most of the wasteful, voluminous materialism our citizens currently engorge themselves in, would not be possible.

look further. think harder. he didn't do it.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to the conspiracy is wrong by 1947

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)